Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
6. But it will not appear absurd if we employ another similitude to make
the matter clearer. Our eyes frequently cannot look upon the nature of
the light itself—that is, upon the substance of the sun; but when we
behold his splendour or his rays pouring in, perhaps, through windows or
some small openings to admit the light, we can reflect how great is the
supply and source of the light of the body. So, in like manner, the
works of Divine Providence and the plan of this whole world are a sort
of rays, as it were, of the nature of God, in comparison with His real
substance and being. As, therefore, our understanding is unable of
itself to behold God Himself as He is, it knows the Father of the world
from the beauty of His works and the comeliness of His creatures. God,
therefore, is not to be thought of as being either a body or as existing
in a body, but as an uncompounded intellectual nature,[31] admitting
within Himself no addition of any kind; so that He cannot be believed to
have within Him a greater and a less, but is such that He is in all
parts Μονάς, and, so to speak, Ἑνάς, and is the mind and source from
which all intellectual nature or mind takes its beginning. But mind, for
its movements or operations, needs no physical space, nor sensible
magnitude, nor bodily shape, nor colour, nor any other of those adjuncts
which are the properties of body or matter. Wherefore that simple and
wholly intellectual nature[32] can admit of no delay or hesitation in
its movements or operations, lest the simplicity of the divine nature
should appear to be circumscribed or in some degree hampered by such
adjuncts, and lest that which is the beginning of all things should be
found composite and differing, and that which ought to be free from all
bodily intermixture, in virtue of being the one sole species of Deity,
so to speak, should prove, instead of being one, to consist of many
things. That mind, moreover, does not require space in order to carry on
its movements agreeably to its nature, is certain from observation of
our own mind. For if the mind abide within its own limits, and sustain
no injury from any cause, it will never, from diversity of situation, be
retarded in the discharge of its functions; nor, on the other hand, does
it gain any addition or increase of mobility from the nature of
particular places. And here, if any one were to object, for example,
that among those who are at sea, and tossed by its waves, the mind is
considerably less vigorous than it is wont to be on land, we are to
believe that it is in this state, not from diversity of situation, but
from the commotion or disturbance of the body to which the mind is
joined or attached. For it seems to be contrary to nature, as it were,
for a human body to live at sea; and for that reason it appears, by a
sort of inequality of its own, to enter upon its mental operations in a
slovenly and irregular manner, and to perform the acts of the intellect
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account