Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
be quickly entangled again in those evils in which they had formerly
been involved when they treated with insolence the requirements of
virtue, and devoted themselves to worse things. Those, then, who are
said to be “without” (manifestly by comparison with those “within”), not
being very far from those “within,” while those “within” hear clearly,
do themselves hear indistinctly, because they are addressed in parables;
but nevertheless they do hear. Others, again, of those “without,” who
are called Tyrians, although it was foreknown that they would have
repented long ago, sitting in sackcloth and ashes, had the Saviour come
near their borders, do not hear even those words which are heard by
those “without” (being, as is probable, very far inferior in merit to
those “without”[522]), in order that at another season, after it has
been more tolerable for them than for those who did not receive the word
(among whom he mentioned also the Tyrians), they may, on hearing the
word at a more appropriate time, obtain a more lasting repentance. But
observe whether, besides our desire to investigate [the truth], we do
not rather strive to maintain an attitude of piety in everything
regarding God and His Christ,[523] seeing we endeavour by every means to
prove that, in matters so great and so peculiar regarding the varied
providence of God, He takes an oversight of the immortal soul. If,
indeed, one were to inquire regarding those things that are objected to,
why those who saw wonders and who heard divine words are not benefited,
while the Tyrians would have repented if such had been performed and
spoken amongst them; and should ask, and say, Why did the Saviour
proclaim such to these persons, to their own hurt, that their sin might
be reckoned to them as heavier? we must say, in answer to such an one,
that He who understands the dispositions[524] of all those who find
fault with His providence—[alleging] that it is owing to it that they
have not believed, because it did not permit them to see what it enabled
others to behold, and did not arrange for them to hear those words by
which others, on hearing them, were benefited—wishing to prove that
their defence is not founded on reason, He grants those advantages which
those who blame His administration asked; in order that, after obtaining
them, they may notwithstanding be convicted of the greatest impiety in
not having even then yielded themselves to be benefited, and may cease
from such audacity; and having been made free in respect to this very
point, may learn that God occasionally, in conferring benefits upon
certain persons, delays and procrastinates, not conferring the favour of
seeing and hearing those things which, when seen and heard, would render
the sin of those who did not believe, after acts so great and peculiar,
heavier and more serious.
FROM THE LATIN.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account