Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
Creator,[567] while we employ the power of will, as well as that of
action, for the noblest objects, or the opposite.
FROM THE LATIN.
20. But with respect to the declaration of the apostle, “Therefore hath
He mercy on whom He will have mercy, and whom He will He hardeneth. Thou
wilt say then unto me, Why doth He yet find fault? For who hath resisted
His will? Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall
the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?
Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one
vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?”[568] Some one will
perhaps say, that as the potter out of the same lump makes some vessels
to honour, and others to dishonour, so God creates some men for
perdition, and others for salvation; and that it is not therefore in our
own power either to be saved or to perish; by which reasoning we appear
not to be possessed of free-will. We must answer those who are of this
opinion with the question, Whether it is possible for the apostle to
contradict himself? And if this cannot be imagined of an apostle, how
shall he appear, according to them, to be just in blaming those who
committed fornication in Corinth, or those who sinned, and did not
repent of their unchastity, and fornication, and uncleanness, which they
had committed? How, also, does he greatly praise those who acted
rightly, like the house of Onesiphorus, saying, “The Lord give mercy to
the house of Onesiphorus; for he oft refreshed me, and was not ashamed
of my chain: but, when he had come to Rome, he sought me out very
diligently, and found me. The Lord grant unto him that he may find mercy
of the Lord in that day.”[569] Now it is not consistent with apostolic
gravity to blame him who is worthy of blame, _i.e._ who has sinned, and
greatly to praise him who is deserving of praise for his good works; and
again, as if it were in no one’s power to do any good or evil, to say
that it was the Creator’s doing that every one should act virtuously or
wickedly, seeing He makes one vessel to honour, and another to
dishonour. And how can he add that statement, “We must all stand before
the judgment-seat of Christ, that every one of us may receive in his
body, according to what he hath done, whether it be good or bad?”[570]
For what reward of good will be conferred on him who could not commit
evil, being formed by the Creator to that very end? or what punishment
will deservedly be inflicted on him who was unable to do good in
consequence of the creative act of his Maker?[571] Then, again, how is
not this opposed to that other declaration elsewhere, that “in a great
house there are not only vessels of gold and silver, but also of wood
and of earth, and some to honour, and some to dishonour. If a man
therefore purge himself from these, he shall be a vessel unto honour,
sanctified, and meet for the Master’s use, prepared unto every good
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account