Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
work.”[572] He, accordingly, who purges himself, is made a vessel unto
honour, while he who has disdained to cleanse himself from his impurity
is made a vessel unto dishonour. From such declarations, in my opinion,
the cause of our actions can in no degree be referred to the Creator.
For God the Creator makes a certain vessel unto honour, and other
vessels to dishonour; but that vessel which has cleansed itself from all
impurity He makes a vessel unto honour, while that which has stained
itself with the filth of vice He makes a vessel unto dishonour. The
conclusion from which, accordingly, is this, that the cause of each
one’s actions is a pre-existing one; and then every one, according to
his deserts, is made by God either a vessel unto honour or dishonour.
Therefore every individual vessel has furnished to its Creator out of
itself the causes and occasions of its being formed by Him to be either
a vessel unto honour or one unto dishonour. And if the assertion appear
correct, as it certainly is, and in harmony with all piety, that it is
due to previous causes that every vessel be prepared by God either to
honour or to dishonour, it does not appear absurd that, in discussing
remoter causes in the same order, and in the same method, we should come
to the same conclusion respecting the nature of souls, and [believe]
that this was the reason why Jacob was beloved before he was born into
this world, and Esau hated, while he still was contained in the womb of
his mother.
FROM THE GREEK.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account