Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
22. But since the apostle in one place does not pretend that the
becoming of a vessel unto honour or dishonour depends upon God, but
refers back the whole to ourselves, saying, “If, then, a man purge
himself, he will be a vessel unto honour, sanctified, meet for the
Master’s use, and prepared unto every good work;” and elsewhere does not
even pretend that it is dependent upon ourselves, but appears to
attribute the whole to God, saying, “The potter hath power over the
clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour and another to
dishonour;” and as his statements are not contradictory, we must
reconcile them, and extract one complete statement from both. Neither
does our own power,[595] apart from the knowledge[596] of God, compel us
to make progress; nor does the knowledge of God [do so], unless we
ourselves also contribute something to the good result; nor does our own
power, apart from the knowledge of God, and the use of the power that
worthily belongs to us,[597] make a man become [a vessel] unto honour or
dishonour; nor does the will of God alone[598] form a man to honour or
dishonour, unless He hold our will to be a kind of matter that admits of
variation,[599] and that inclines to a better or worse course of
conduct. And these observations are sufficient to have been made by us
on the subject of free-will.
Footnote 353:
The whole of this chapter has been preserved in the original Greek,
which is _literally_ translated in corresponding portions on each
page, so that the differences between Origen’s own words and the
amplifications and alterations of the paraphrase of Rufinus may be at
once patent to the reader.
Footnote 354:
Natura ipsius arbitrii voluntatisque.
Footnote 355:
περὶ τοῦ αὐτεξουσίου.
Footnote 356:
τὴν ἔννοιαν αὐτοῦ ἀναπτύξαι.
Footnote 357:
Quæcunque hujusmodi sunt, quæ solo habitu materiæ suæ vel corporum
constant.
Footnote 358:
Non tamen animantia sunt.
Footnote 359:
Phantasia.
Footnote 360:
Voluntas vel sensus.
Footnote 361:
Mella, ut aiunt, aeria congregandi. Rufinus seems to have read, in the
original, ἀεροπλαστεῖν instead of κηροπλαστεῖν,—an evidence that he
followed in general the worst readings (Redepenning).
Footnote 362:
ὑπὸ ἕξεως μόνης.
Footnote 363:
φαντασίας.
Footnote 364:
φύσεως φανταστικῆς.
Footnote 365:
καὶ οὐδενὸς ἄλλου μετὰ τὴν φανταστικὴν αὐτοῦ φύσιν πεπιστευμένου τοῦ
ζώου.
Footnote 366:
Ordinatior quidem motus.
Footnote 367:
Incentivo quodam et naturali motu.
Footnote 368:
ποσῶς.
Footnote 369:
παρὰ τὰς ἀφορμὰς.
Footnote 370:
Ita ut etiam verisimilibus quibusdam causis intra cordis nostri
tribunalia velut judici residenti ex utrâque parte adhiberi videatur
assertio, ut causis prius expositis gerendi sententia de rationis
judicio proferatur.
Footnote 371:
Causa ei perfecta et absoluta vel necessitas prævaricandi.
Footnote 372:
διὰ τάσδε τὰς πιθανότητας.
Footnote 373:
αὐτοτελής.
Footnote 374:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account