Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
3. That there are certain sins, however, which do not proceed from the
opposing powers, but take their beginnings from the natural movements of
the body, is manifestly declared by the Apostle Paul in the passage:
“The flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh:
and these are contrary the one to the other; so that ye cannot do the
things that ye would.”[625] If, then, the flesh lust against the Spirit,
and the Spirit against the flesh, we have occasionally to wrestle
against flesh and blood, _i.e._ as being men, and walking according to
the flesh, and not capable of being tempted by greater than human
temptations; since it is said of us, “There hath no temptation taken
you, but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, who will not
suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able.”[626] For as the
presidents of the public games do not allow the competitors to enter the
lists indiscriminately or fortuitously, but after a careful examination,
pairing in a most impartial consideration either of size or age, this
individual with that—boys, _e.g._, with boys, men with men, who are
nearly related to each other either in age or strength; so also must we
understand the procedure of divine providence, which arranges on most
impartial principles all who descend into the struggles of this human
life, according to the nature of each individual’s power, which is known
only to Him who alone beholds the hearts of men: so that one individual
fights against one temptation of the flesh,[627] another against a
second; one is exposed to its influence for so long a period of time,
another only for so long; one is tempted by the flesh to this or that
indulgence, another to one of a different kind; one has to resist this
or that hostile power, another has to combat two or three at the same
time; or at one time this hostile influence, at another that; at some
particular date having to resist one enemy, and at another a different
one; being, after the performance of certain acts, exposed to one set of
enemies, after others to a second. And observe whether some such state
of things be not indicated by the language of the apostle: “God is
faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above what ye are
able,”[628] _i.e._ each one is tempted in proportion to the amount of
his strength or power of resistance.[629] Now, although we have said
that it is by the just judgment of God that every one is tempted
according to the amount of his strength, we are not therefore to suppose
that he who is tempted ought by all means to prove victorious in the
struggle; in like manner as he who contends in the lists, although
paired with his adversary on a just principle of arrangement, will
nevertheless not necessarily prove conqueror. But unless the powers of
the combatants are equal, the prize of the victor will not be justly
won; nor will blame justly attach to the vanquished, because He allows
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account