Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
us indeed to be tempted, but not “beyond what we are able:” for it is in
proportion to our strength that we are tempted; and it is not written
that, in temptation, He will make also a way to escape so as that we
should bear it, but a way to escape so as that we should be able to bear
it.[630] But it depends upon ourselves to use either with energy or
feebleness this power which He has given us. For there is no doubt that
under every temptation we have a power of endurance, if we employ
properly the strength that is granted us. But it is not the same thing
to possess the _power_ of conquering and to be victorious, as the
apostle himself has shown in very cautious language, saying, “God will
make a way to escape, that you may be _able_ to bear it,”[631] not that
you _will_ bear it. For many do not sustain temptation, but are overcome
by it. Now God enables us not to sustain [temptation], [otherwise there
would appear to be no struggle], but to have the _power_ of sustaining
it.[632] But this power which is given us to enable us to conquer may be
used, according to our faculty of free-will, either in a diligent
manner, and then we prove victorious, or in a slothful manner, and then
we are defeated. For if such a power were wholly given us as that we
must by all means prove victorious, and never be defeated, what further
reason for a struggle could remain to him who cannot be overcome? Or
what merit is there in a victory, where the power of successful
resistance[633] is taken away? But if the possibility of conquering be
equally conferred on us all, and if it be in our own power how to use
this possibility, _i.e._ either diligently or slothfully, then will the
vanquished be justly censured, and the victor be deservedly lauded. Now
from these points which we have discussed to the best of our power, it
is, I think, clearly evident that there are certain transgressions which
we by no means commit under the pressure of malignant powers; while
there are others, again, to which we are incited by instigation on their
part to excessive and immoderate indulgence. Whence it follows that we
have to inquire how those opposing powers produce these incitements
within us.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account