Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
may be measured by any divisions of time, but even that which the mind
alone can contemplate within itself, or behold, so to speak, with the
naked powers of the understanding. And therefore we must believe that
Wisdom was generated before any beginning that can be either
comprehended or expressed. And since all the creative power of the
coming creation[47] was included in this very existence of Wisdom
(whether of those things which have an original or of those which have a
derived existence), having been formed beforehand and arranged by the
power of foreknowledge; on account of these very creatures which had
been described, as it were, and prefigured in Wisdom herself, does
Wisdom say, in the words of Solomon, that she was created the beginning
of the ways of God, inasmuch as she contained within herself either the
beginnings, or forms, or species of all creation.
3. Now, in the same way in which we have understood that Wisdom was the
beginning of the ways of God, and is said to be created, forming
beforehand and containing within herself the species and beginnings of
all creatures, must we understand her to be the Word of God, because of
her disclosing to all other beings, _i.e._ to universal creation, the
nature of the mysteries and secrets which are contained within the
divine wisdom; and on this account she is called the Word, because she
is, as it were, the interpreter of the secrets of the mind. And
therefore that language which is found in the _Acts of Paul_,[48] where
it is said that “here is the Word a living being,” appears to me to be
rightly used. John, however, with more sublimity and propriety, says in
the beginning of his Gospel, when defining God by a special definition
to be the Word, “And God was the Word,[49] and this was in the beginning
with God.” Let him, then, who assigns a beginning to the Word or Wisdom
of God, take care that he be not guilty of impiety against the
unbegotten Father Himself, seeing he denies that He had always been a
Father, and had generated the Word, and had possessed wisdom in all
preceding periods, whether they be called times or ages, or anything
else that can be so entitled.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account