Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
21. This, then, being the state of the case, the holy apostle desiring
to elevate in some degree, and to raise our understanding above the
earth, says in a certain place, “Behold Israel after the flesh;”[986] by
which he certainly means that there is another Israel which is not
according to the flesh, but according to the Spirit. And again in
another passage, “For they are not all Israelites who are of
Israel.”[987]
FROM THE GREEK.
21. Such, then, being the state of the case, the apostle, elevating our
power of discernment [above the letter], says somewhere, “Behold Israel
after the flesh,”[988] as if there were an Israel “according to the
Spirit.” And in another place he says, “For they who are the children of
the flesh are not the children of God;” nor are “they all Israel who are
of Israel;”[989] nor is “he a Jew who is one outwardly, nor is that
‘circumcision’ which is outward in the flesh: but he is a Jew who is one
‘inwardly;’ and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and
not in the letter.”[990] For if the judgment respecting the “Jew
inwardly” be adopted, we must understand that, as there is a “bodily”
race of Jews, so also is there a race of “Jews inwardly,” the soul
having acquired this nobility for certain mysterious reasons. Moreover,
there are many prophecies which predict regarding Israel and Judah what
is about to befall them. And do not such promises as are written
concerning them, in respect of their being mean in expression, and
manifesting no elevation [of thought], nor anything worthy of the
promise of God, need a mystical interpretation? And if the “spiritual”
promises are announced by visible signs, then they to whom the promises
are made are not “corporeal.” And not to linger over the point of the
Jew who is a Jew “inwardly,” nor over that of the Israelite according to
the “inner man”—these statements being sufficient for those who are not
devoid of understanding—we return to our subject, and say that Jacob is
the father of the twelve patriarchs, and they of the rulers of the
people; and these, again, of the other Israelites. Do not, then, the
“corporeal” Israelites refer their descent to the rulers of the people,
and the rulers of the people to the patriarchs, and the patriarchs to
Jacob, and those still higher up; while are not the “spiritual”
Israelites, of whom the “corporeal” Israelites were the type, sprung
from the families, and the families from the tribes, and the tribes from
some one individual whose descent is not of a “corporeal” but of a
better kind,—he, too, being born of Isaac, and he of Abraham,—all going
back to Adam, whom the apostle declares to be Christ? For every
beginning of those families which have relation to God as to the Father
of all, took its commencement lower down with Christ, who is next to the
God and Father of all,[991] being thus the Father of every soul, as Adam
is the father of all men. And if Eve also is intended by the apostle to
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account