Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
refer to the church, it is not surprising that Cain, who was born of
Eve, and all after him, whose descent goes back to Eve, should be types
of the church, inasmuch as in a pre-eminent sense they are all descended
from the church.
FROM THE LATIN.
22. Being taught, then, by him that there is one Israel according to the
flesh, and another according to the Spirit, when the Saviour says, “I am
not sent but to the lost sheep of the house of Israel,”[992] we do not
understand these words as those do who savour of earthly things, _i.e._
the Ebionites, who derive the appellation of “poor” from their very name
(for “Ebion” means “poor” in Hebrew[993]); but we understand that there
exists a race of souls which is termed “Israel,” as is indicated by the
interpretation of the name itself: for Israel is interpreted to mean a
“mind,” or “man seeing God.” The apostle, again, makes a similar
revelation respecting Jerusalem, saying, “The Jerusalem which is above
is free, which is the mother of us all.”[994] And in another of his
epistles he says: “But ye are come unto mount Zion, and to the city of
the living God, and to the heavenly Jerusalem, and to an innumerable
company of angels, and to the church of the first-born which is written
in heaven.”[995] If, then, there are certain souls in this world who are
called Israel, and a city in heaven which is called Jerusalem, it
follows that those cities which are said to belong to the nation of
Israel have the heavenly Jerusalem as their metropolis; and that,
agreeably to this, we understand as referring to the whole of Judah (of
which also we are of opinion that the prophets have spoken in certain
mystical narratives), any predictions delivered either regarding Judea
or Jerusalem, or invasions of any kind, which the sacred histories
declare to have happened to Judea or Jerusalem. Whatever, then, is
either narrated or predicted of Jerusalem, must, if we accept the words
of Paul as those of Christ speaking in him, be understood as spoken in
conformity with his opinion regarding that city which he calls the
heavenly Jerusalem, and all those places or cities which are said to be
cities of the holy land, of which Jerusalem is the metropolis. For we
are to suppose that it is from these very cities that the Saviour,
wishing to raise us to a higher grade of intelligence, promises to those
who have well managed the money entrusted to them by Himself, that they
are to have power over ten or five cities. If, then, the prophecies
delivered concerning Judea, and Jerusalem, and Judah, and Israel, and
Jacob, not being understood by us in a carnal sense, signify certain
divine mysteries, it certainly follows that those prophecies also which
were delivered either concerning Egypt, or the Egyptians, or Babylonia
and the Babylonians, and Sidon and the Sidonians, are not to be
understood as spoken of that Egypt which is situated on the earth, or of
the earthly Babylon, Tyre, or Sidon.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account