Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
shall ask them if one portion of matter is God, and the other part the
world? But if they shall say of matter that it is made, it will
undoubtedly follow that they confess Him whom they declare to be God to
have been made!—a result which certainly neither their reason nor ours
can admit. But they will say, God is invisible. And what will you do? If
you say that He is invisible by nature, then neither ought He to be
visible to the Saviour. Whereas, on the contrary, God, the Father of
Christ, is said to be seen, because “he who sees the Son,” he says,
“sees also the Father.”[197] This certainly would press us very hard,
were the expression not understood by us more correctly of
understanding, and not of seeing. For he who has understood the Son will
understand the Father also. In this way, then, Moses too must be
supposed to have seen God, not beholding Him with the bodily eye, but
understanding Him with the vision of the heart and the perception of the
mind, and that only in some degree. For it is manifest that He, viz.,
who gave answers to Moses, said, “You shall not see my face, but my
hinder parts.”[198] These words are, of course, to be understood in that
mystical sense which is befitting divine words, those old wives’ fables
being rejected and despised which are invented by ignorant persons
respecting the anterior and posterior parts of God. Let no one indeed
suppose that we have indulged any feeling of impiety in saying that even
to the Saviour the Father is not visible. Let him consider the
distinction which we employ in dealing with heretics. For we have
explained that it is one thing to see and to be seen, and another to
know and to be known, or to understand and to be understood.[199] To
see, then, and to be seen, is a property of bodies, which certainly will
not be appropriately applied either to the Father, or to the Son, or to
the Holy Spirit, in their mutual relations with one another. For the
nature of the Trinity surpasses the measure of vision, granting to those
who are in the body, _i.e._ to all other creatures, the property of
vision in reference to one another. But to a nature that is incorporeal
and for the most part intellectual, no other attribute is appropriate
save that of knowing or being known, as the Saviour Himself declares
when He says, “No man knoweth the Son, save the Father; nor does any one
know the Father, save the Son, and he to whom the Son will reveal
Him.”[200] It is clear, then, that He has not said, “No one has seen the
Father, save the Son;” but, “No one knoweth the Father, save the Son.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account