Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
1. Now, since this consideration has weight with some, that the leaders
of that heresy (of which we have been speaking) think they have
established a kind of division, according to which they have declared
that justice is one thing and goodness another, and have applied this
division even to divine things, maintaining that the Father of our Lord
Jesus Christ is indeed a good God, but not a just one, whereas the God
of the law and the prophets is just, but not good; I think it necessary
to return, with as much brevity as possible, an answer to these
statements. These persons, then, consider goodness to be some such
affection as would have benefits conferred on all, although the
recipient of them be unworthy and undeserving of any kindness; but here,
in my opinion, they have not rightly applied their definition, inasmuch
as they think that no benefit is conferred on him who is visited with
any suffering or calamity. Justice, on the other hand, they view as that
quality which rewards every one according to his deserts. But here,
again, they do not rightly interpret the meaning of their own
definition. For they think that it is just to send evils upon the wicked
and benefits upon the good; _i.e._ so that, according to their view, the
just God does not appear to wish well to the bad, but to be animated by
a kind of hatred against them. And they gather together instances of
this, wherever they find a history in the Scriptures of the Old
Testament, relating, _e.g._, the punishment of the deluge, or the fate
of those who are described as perishing in it, or the destruction of
Sodom and Gomorrha by a shower of fire and brimstone, or the falling of
all the people in the wilderness on account of their sins, so that none
of those who had left Egypt were found to have entered the promised
land, with the exception of Joshua and Caleb. Whereas from the New
Testament they gather together words of compassion and piety, through
which the disciples are trained by the Saviour, and by which it seems to
be declared that no one is good save God the Father only; and by this
means they have ventured to style the Father of the Saviour Jesus Christ
a good God, but to say that the God of the world is a different one,
whom they are pleased to term just, but not also good.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account