Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
do not proceed from God, but cleave to matter; and that, as the cause of
mortal events never varies, the same things must always return,
according to the appointed cycles: Answers—chaps. lxv.-lxix. Assertion
of Celsus that a thing which seems to be evil may not necessarily be so:
Examined—chap. lxx. Celsus misunderstands the anthropopathic language of
Scripture: Explanation—chaps. lxxi.-lxxiii. Celsus finds fault with
Christians for asserting that God made all things for the sake of man,
whereas they were made as much for the sake of the irrational animals:
Answer—chap. lxxiv. Celsus holds that thunders, and lightnings, and
rains are not the works of God; that even if they were, they were
brought into existence as much for the sake of plants, and trees, and
herbs, as for that of human beings: Answer—chaps. lxxv., lxxvi. Celsus
maintains that the verse of Euripides, viz. “The sun and night are to
mortals slaves,” is untrue, as these luminaries may be said to be
created for the use of ants and flies as much as of man: Answer—chap.
lxxvii. Asserts that we may be said to be created as much on account of
irrational animals as they on our account: Answer—chaps. lxxviii.-lxxx.
Celsus maintains that the superiority of man over irrational animals in
building cities and founding political communities is only apparent:
Examination of this assertion—chaps. lxxxi.-lxxxiv. No great difference,
according to Celsus, between the actions of men, and those of ants and
bees—chap. lxxxv. Certain irrational animals, according to Celsus,
possess the power of sorcery; instances: Examination of these—chaps.
lxxxvi., lxxxvii. Assertion that the thoughts entertained of God by
irrational animals are not inferior to those of men; illustrations:
Answer—chaps. lxxxviii., lxxxix. Degrading views of Celsus—chaps.
xc.-xcix.
BOOK V., 268-335
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account