Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
But let Celsus, and those who assent to his charges, tell us whether it
is at all like “an ass’s shadow,” that the Jewish prophets should have
predicted the birth-place of Him who was to be the ruler of those who
had lived righteous lives, and who are called the “heritage” of
God;[253] and that Emmanuel should be conceived by a virgin; and that
such signs and wonders should be performed by Him who was the subject of
prophecy; and that His word should have such speedy course, that the
voice of His apostles should go forth into all the earth; and that He
should undergo certain sufferings after His condemnation by the Jews;
and that He should rise again from the dead. For was it by chance[254]
that the prophets made these announcements, with no persuasion of their
truth in their minds,[255] moving them not only to speak, but to deem
their announcements worthy of being committed to writing? And did so
great a nation as that of the Jews, who had long ago received a country
of their own wherein to dwell, recognise certain men as prophets, and
reject others as utterers of false predictions, without any conviction
of the soundness of the distinction? And was there no motive which
induced them to class with the books of Moses, which were held as
sacred, the words of those persons who were afterwards deemed to be
prophets? And can those who charge the Jews and Christians with folly,
show us how the Jewish nation could have continued to subsist, had there
existed among them no promise of the knowledge of future events? and
how, while each of the surrounding nations believed, agreeably to their
ancient institutions, that they received oracles and predictions from
those whom they accounted gods, this people alone, who were taught to
view with contempt all those who were considered gods by the heathen, as
not being gods, but demons, according to the declaration of the
prophets, “For all the gods of the nations are demons,”[256] had among
them no one who professed to be a prophet, and who could restrain such
as, from a desire to know the future, were ready to desert[257] to the
demons of other nations? Judge, then, whether it were not a necessity,
that as the whole nation had been taught to despise the deities of other
lands, they should have had an abundance of prophets, who made known
events which were of far greater importance in themselves,[258] and
which surpassed the oracles of all other countries.
Footnote 253:
τῶν χρηματιζόντων μερίδος Θεοῦ.
Footnote 254:
ἆρα γὰρ ὡς ἔτυχε.
Footnote 255:
σὺν οὐδεμιᾷ πιθανότητι.
Footnote 256:
Ps. xcvi. 5, δαιμόνια; “idols,” Auth. Vers. We have in this passage,
and in many others, the identification of the δαίμονες or gods of the
heathen with the δαίμονες or δαιμόνια, “evil spirits,” or angels,
supposed to be mentioned in Gen. vi. 2.
Footnote 257:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account