Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
For with what purpose in view did Providence accomplish the marvels
related of Aristeas? And to confer what benefit upon the human race did
such remarkable events, as you regard them, take place? You cannot
answer. But we, when we relate the events of the history of Jesus, have
no ordinary defence to offer for their occurrence;—this, viz., that God
desired to commend the doctrine of Jesus as a doctrine which was to save
mankind, and which was based, indeed, upon the apostles as foundations
of the rising[325] edifice of Christianity, but which increased in
magnitude also in the succeeding ages, in which not a few cures are
wrought in the name of Jesus, and certain other manifestations of no
small moment have taken place. Now what sort of person is Apollo, who
enjoined the Metapontines to treat Aristeas as a god? And with what
object does he do this? And what advantage was he procuring to the
Metapontines from this divine worship, if they were to regard him as a
god, who a little ago was a mortal? And yet the recommendations of
Apollo (viewed by us as a demon who has obtained the honour of libation
and sacrificial odours[326]) regarding this Aristeas appear to you to be
worthy of consideration; while those of the God of all things, and of
His holy angels, made known beforehand through the prophets—not _after_
the birth of Jesus, but _before_ He appeared among men—do not stir you
up to admiration, not merely of the prophets who received the Divine
Spirit, but of Him also who was the object of their predictions, whose
entrance into life was so clearly predicted many years beforehand by
numerous prophets, that the whole Jewish people who were hanging in
expectation of the coming of Him who was looked for, did, after the
advent of Jesus, fall into a keen dispute with each other; and that a
great multitude of them acknowledged Christ, and believed Him to be the
object of prophecy, while others did not believe in Him, but, despising
the meekness of those who, on account of the teaching of Jesus, were
unwilling to cause even the most trifling sedition, dared to inflict on
Jesus those cruelties which His disciples have so truthfully and
candidly recorded, without secretly omitting from their marvellous
history of Him what seems to the multitude to bring disgrace upon the
doctrine of Christianity. But both Jesus Himself and His disciples
desired that His followers should believe not merely in His Godhead and
miracles, as if He had not also been a partaker of human nature, and had
assumed the human flesh which “lusteth against the Spirit;”[327] but
they saw also that the power which had descended into human nature, and
into the midst of human miseries, and which had assumed a human soul and
body, contributed through faith, along with its divine elements, to the
salvation of believers,[328] when they see that from Him there began the
union of the divine with the human nature, in order that the human, by
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account