Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
But observe whether the principles of our faith, harmonizing with the
general ideas implanted in our minds at birth, do not produce a change
upon those who listen candidly to its statements; for although a
perverted view of things, with the aid of much instruction to the same
effect, has been able to implant in the minds of the multitude the
belief that images are gods, and that things made of gold, and silver,
and ivory, and stone are deserving of worship, yet common sense[369]
forbids the supposition that God is at all a piece of corruptible
matter, or is honoured when made to assume by men a form embodied in
dead matter, fashioned according to some image or symbol of His
appearance. And therefore we say at once of images that they are not
gods, and of such creations (of art) that they are not to be compared
with the Creator, but are small in contrast with the God who is over
all, and who created, and upholds, and governs the universe. And the
rational soul recognising, as it were, its relationship [to the divine],
at once rejects what it for a time supposed to be gods, and resumes its
natural love[370] for its Creator; and because of its affection towards
Him, receives Him also who first presented these truths to all nations
through the disciples whom He had appointed, and whom He sent forth,
furnished with divine power and authority, to proclaim the doctrine
regarding God and His kingdom.
Footnote 369:
ἡ κοινὴ ἔννοια.
Footnote 370:
φίλτρον φυσικὸν.
Chapter XLI.
But since he has charged us, I know not how often already, “with
regarding this Jesus, who was but a mortal body, as a God, and with
supposing that we act piously in so doing,” it is superfluous to say any
more in answer to this, as a great deal has been said in the preceding
pages. And yet let those who make this charge understand that He whom we
regard and believe to have been from the beginning God, and the Son of
God, is the very Logos, and the very Wisdom, and the very Truth; and
with respect to His mortal body, and the human soul which it contained,
we assert that not by their communion merely with Him, but by their
unity and intermixture,[371] they received the highest powers, and after
participating in His divinity, were changed into God. And if any one
should feel a difficulty at our saying this regarding His body, let him
attend to what is said by the Greeks regarding matter, which, properly
speaking, being without qualities, receives such as the Creator desires
to invest it with, and which frequently divests itself of those which it
formerly possessed, and assumes others of a different and higher kind.
And if these opinions be correct, what is there wonderful in this, that
the mortal quality of the body of Jesus, if the providence of God has so
willed it, should have been changed into one that was ethereal and
divine?
Footnote 371:
ἀλλὰ καὶ ἑνώσει καὶ ἀνακράσει.
Chapter XLII.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account