Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
We acknowledge, however, although Celsus will not have it so, that we
_do_ desire to instruct all men in the word of God, so as to give to
young men the exhortations which are appropriate to them, and to show to
slaves how they may recover freedom of thought,[402] and be ennobled by
the word. And those amongst us who are the ambassadors of Christianity
sufficiently declare that they are debtors[403] to Greeks and
barbarians, to wise men and fools, (for they do not deny their
obligation to cure the souls even of foolish persons,) in order that as
far as possible they may lay aside their ignorance, and endeavour to
obtain greater prudence, by listening also to the words of Solomon: “Oh,
ye fools, be of an understanding heart,”[404] and “Who is the most
simple among you, let him turn unto me;”[405] and wisdom exhorts those
who are devoid of understanding in the words, “Come, eat of my bread,
and drink of the wine which I have mixed for you. Forsake folly that ye
may live, and correct understanding in knowledge.”[406] This too would I
say (seeing it bears on the point),[407] in answer to the statement of
Celsus: Do not philosophers invite young men to their lectures? and do
they not encourage young men to exchange a wicked life for a better? and
do they not desire slaves to learn philosophy? Must we find fault, then,
with philosophers who have exhorted slaves to the practice of virtue?
with Pythagoras for having so done with Zamolxis, Zeno with Perseus, and
with those who recently encouraged Epictetus to the study of philosophy?
Is it indeed permissible for you, O Greeks, to call youths and slaves
and foolish persons to the study of philosophy, but if _we_ do so, we do
not act from philanthropic motives in wishing to heal every rational
nature with the medicine of reason, and to bring them into fellowship
with God, the Creator of all things? These remarks, then, may suffice in
answer to what are slanders rather than accusations[408] on the part of
Celsus.
Footnote 402:
ἐλεύθερον ἀναλαβόντες φρόνημα.
Footnote 403:
Cf. Rom. i. 14.
Footnote 404:
Cf. Prov. viii. 5.
Footnote 405:
Cf. Prov. ix. 4.
Footnote 406:
Cf. Prov. ix. 5, 6.
Footnote 407:
διὰ τὰ ἐγκείμενα.
Footnote 408:
λοιδορίας μᾶλλον ἢ κατηγορίας.
Chapter LV.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account