Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
The first book of our answer to the treatise of Celsus, entitled _A True
Discourse_, which concluded with the representation of the Jew
addressing Jesus, having now extended to a sufficient length, we intend
the present part as a reply to the charges brought by him against those
who have been converted from Judaism to Christianity. And we call
attention, in the first place, to this special question, viz. why
Celsus, when he had once resolved upon the introduction of individuals
upon the stage of his book, did not represent the Jew as addressing the
converts from heathenism rather than those from Judaism, seeing that his
discourse, if directed to us, would have appeared more likely to produce
an impression.[35] But probably this claimant to universal knowledge
does not know what is appropriate in the matter of such representations;
and therefore let us proceed to consider what he has to say to the
converts from Judaism. He asserts that “they have forsaken the law of
their fathers, in consequence of their minds being led captive by Jesus;
that they have been most ridiculously deceived, and that they have
become deserters to another name and to another mode of life.” Here he
has not observed that the Jewish converts have not deserted the law of
their fathers, inasmuch as they live according to its prescriptions,
receiving their very name from the poverty of the law, according to the
literal acceptation of the word; for Ebion signifies “poor” among the
Jews,[36] and those Jews who have received Jesus as Christ are called by
the name of Ebionites. Nay, Peter himself seems to have observed for a
considerable time the Jewish observances enjoined by the law of Moses,
not having yet learned from Jesus to ascend from the law that is
regulated according to the letter, to that which is interpreted
according to the spirit,—a fact which we learn from the Acts of the
Apostles. For on the day after the angel of God appeared to Cornelius,
suggesting to him “to send to Joppa, to Simon surnamed Peter,” Peter
“went up into the upper room to pray about the sixth hour. And he became
very hungry, and would have eaten: but while they made ready he fell
into a trance, and saw heaven opened, and a certain vessel descending
unto him, as it had been a great sheet knit at the four corners, and let
down to the earth; wherein were all manner of four-footed beasts, and
creeping things of the earth, and fowls of the air. And there came a
voice to him, Rise, Peter; kill, and eat. But Peter said, Not so, Lord;
for I have never eaten anything that is common or unclean. And the voice
spake unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, that call
thou not common.”[37] Now observe how, by this instance, Peter is
represented as still observing the Jewish customs respecting clean and
unclean animals. And from the narrative that follows, it is manifest
that he, as being yet a Jew, and living according to their traditions,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account