Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
Celsus, however, accepting or granting that Jesus foreknew what would
befall Him, might think to make light of the admission, as he did in the
case of the miracles, when he alleged that they were wrought by means of
sorcery; for he might say that many persons by means of divination,
either by auspices, or auguries, or sacrifices, or nativities, have come
to the knowledge of what was to happen. But this concession he would not
make, as being too great a one; and although he somehow granted that
Jesus worked miracles, he thought to weaken the force of this by the
charge of sorcery. Now Phlegon, in the thirteenth or fourteenth book, I
think, of his Chronicles, not only ascribed to Jesus a knowledge of
future events (although falling into confusion about some things which
refer to Peter, as if they referred to Jesus), but also testified that
the result corresponded to His predictions. So that he also, by these
very admissions regarding foreknowledge, as if against his will,
expressed his opinion that the doctrines taught by the fathers of our
system were not devoid of divine power.
Chapter XV.
Celsus continues: “The disciples of Jesus, having no undoubted fact on
which to rely, devised the fiction that he foreknew everything before it
happened;” not observing, or not wishing to observe, the love of truth
which actuated the writers, who acknowledged that Jesus had told His
disciples beforehand, “All ye shall be offended because of me this
night,”—a statement which was fulfilled by their all being offended; and
that He predicted to Peter, “Before the cock crow, thou shalt deny me
thrice,” which was followed by Peter’s threefold denial. Now if they had
not been lovers of truth, but, as Celsus supposes, inventors of
fictions, they would not have represented Peter as denying, nor His
disciples as being offended. For although these events actually
happened, who could have proved that they turned out in that manner? And
yet, according to all probability, these were matters which ought to
have been passed over in silence by men who wished to teach the readers
of the Gospels to despise death for the sake of confessing Christianity.
But now, seeing that the word, by its power, will gain the mastery over
men, they related those facts which they have done, and which, I know
not how, were neither to do any harm to their readers, nor to afford any
pretext for denial.
Chapter XVI.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account