Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
Now the Jews are not much acquainted with Greek literature; but suppose
that there was a Jew so well versed in it [as to make such a quotation
on his part appropriate], how [does it follow] that Jesus _could_ not
liberate Himself, because He did not do so? For let him believe from our
own Scriptures that Peter obtained his freedom after having been bound
in prison, an angel having loosed his chains; and that Paul, having been
bound in the stocks along with Silas in Philippi of Macedonia, was
liberated by divine power, when the gates of the prison were opened. But
it is probable that Celsus treats these accounts with ridicule, or that
he never read them; for he would probably say in reply, that there are
certain sorcerers who are able by incantations to unloose chains and to
open doors, so that he would liken the events related in our histories
to the doings of sorcerers. “But,” he continues, “no calamity happened
even to him who condemned him, as there did to Pentheus, viz. madness or
discerption.”[113] And yet he does not know that it was not so much
Pilate that condemned Him (who knew that “for envy the Jews had
delivered Him”), as the Jewish nation, which _has_ been condemned by
God, and rent in pieces, and dispersed over the whole earth, in a degree
far beyond what happened to Pentheus. Moreover, why did he intentionally
omit what is related of Pilate’s wife, who beheld a vision, and who was
so moved by it as to send a message to her husband, saying: “Have thou
nothing to do with that just man; for I have suffered many things this
day in a dream because of him?”[114] And again, passing by in silence
the proofs of the divinity of Jesus, Celsus endeavours to cast reproach
upon Him from the narratives in the Gospel, referring to those who
mocked Jesus, and put on Him the purple robe, and the crown of thorns,
and placed the reed in His hand. From what source now, Celsus, did you
derive these statements, save from the Gospel narratives? And did you,
accordingly, see that they were fit matters for reproach, while they who
recorded them did not think that you, and such as you, would turn them
into ridicule; but that others would receive from them an example how to
despise those who ridiculed and mocked Him on account of His religion,
who appropriately laid down His life for its sake? Admire rather their
love of truth, and that of the Being who bore these things voluntarily
for the sake of men, and who endured them with all constancy and
long-suffering. For it is not recorded that He uttered any lamentation,
or that after His condemnation He either did or uttered anything
unbecoming.
Footnote 112:
Eurip. _Bacchæ_, v. 498 (ed. Dindorf).
Footnote 113:
Cf. Euseb. _Hist. Eccles._ b. ii. c. vii.
Footnote 114:
Matt. xxvii. 19.
Chapter XXXV.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account