Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
But in answer to this objection, “If not before, yet why now, at least,
does he not give some manifestation of his divinity, and free himself
from this reproach, and take vengeance upon those who insult both him
and his Father?” We have to reply, that it would be the same thing as if
we were to say to those among the Greeks who accept the doctrine of
providence, and who believe in portents, Why does God not punish those
who insult the Divinity, and subvert the doctrine of providence? For as
the Greeks would answer such objections, so would we, in the same, or a
more effective manner. There was not only a portent from heaven—the
eclipse of the sun—but also the other miracles, which show that the
crucified One possessed something that was divine, and greater than was
possessed by the majority of men.
Chapter XXXVI.
Celsus next says: “What is the nature of the ichor in the body of the
crucified Jesus? Is it ‘such as flows in the bodies of the immortal
gods?’”[115] He puts this question in a spirit of mockery; but we shall
show from the serious narratives of the Gospels, although Celsus may not
like it, that it was no mythic and Homeric ichor which flowed from the
body of Jesus, but that, after His death, “one of the soldiers with a
spear pierced His side, and there came thereout blood and water. And he
that saw it bare record, and his record is true, and he knoweth that he
saith the truth.”[116] Now, in other dead bodies the blood congeals, and
pure water does not flow forth; but the miraculous feature in the case
of the dead body of Jesus was, that around the dead body blood and water
flowed forth from the side. But if this Celsus, who, in order to find
matter of accusation against Jesus and the Christians, extracts from the
Gospel even passages which are incorrectly interpreted, but passes over
in silence the evidences of the divinity of Jesus, would listen to
divine portents, let him read the Gospel, and see that even the
centurion, and they who with him kept watch over Jesus, on seeing the
earthquake, and the events that occurred, were greatly afraid, saying,
“This man was the son of God.”[117]
Footnote 115:
Cf. _Iliad_, vi. 340.
Footnote 116:
Cf. John xix. 34, 35.
Footnote 117:
Cf. Matt. xxvii. 54.
Chapter XXXVII.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account