Another exception to the rule of priority is, when a motion has been made to strike out or agree to a paragraph. Motions to amend it are to be put to the question, before a vote is taken on striking out, or agreeing to the whole paragraph. But there are several questions, which, being incidental to every one, will take place of every one, privileged or not; to wit, a question of order arising out of any other question, must be decided before that question.--2 _Hats._ 88. A matter of privilege arising out of any question, or from a quarrel between two members, or any other cause, supersedes the consideration of the original question, and must first be disposed of.--2 _Hats._ 88. Reading papers relative to the question before the House. This question must be put before the principal one.--2 _Hats._ 88. Leave asked to withdraw a motion. The rule of Parliament being, that a motion made and seconded is in possession of the House, and cannot be withdrawn without leave, the very terms of the rule imply that leave may be given, and, consequently, may be asked and put to the question. SECTION XXXIV. THE PREVIOUS QUESTION. When any question is before the House, any member may move a previous question, "Whether that question (called the main question) shall now be put?" If it pass in the affirmative, then the main question is to be put immediately, and no man may speak anything further to it, either to add or alter.--_Memor. in Hakew._ 28; 4 _Grey_, 27. $The previous question being moved and seconded, the question from the chair shall be, "Shall the main question be now put?" and if the nays prevail, the main question shall not then be put--_Rule_ 9.$ This kind of question is understood by Mr. Hatsell to have been introduced in 1604.--2 _Hats._ 80. Sir Henry Vane introduced it.--2 _Grey_, 113, 114; 3 _Grey_, 384. When the question was put in this form, "Shall the main question be put?" a determination in the negative suppressed the main question during the session; but since the words "now put" are used, they exclude it for the present only. Formerly, indeed, only till the present debate was over; 4 _Grey_, 43; but now for that day and no longer.--2 _Grey_, 113, 114. Before the question, "Whether the main question shall now be put?" any person might formerly have spoken to the main question, because otherwise he would be precluded from speaking to it at all.--_Mem. in Hakew._ 28.