The Writings of Thomas Paine — Volume 4 (1794-1796): The Age of ReasonPaine, Thomas
Religion
The Writings of Thomas Paine — Volume 4 (1794-1796): The Age of Reason
Paine, Thomas
Philosophy and religion; Political science; Rationalism
As to the account of Christ being seen by more than five hundred at
once, it is Paul only who says it, and not the five hundred who say it
for themselves. It is, therefore, the testimony of but one man, and
that too of a man, who did not, according to the same account, believe
a word of the matter himself at the time it is said to have happened.
His evidence, supposing him to have been the writer of Corinthians xv.,
where this account is given, is like that of a man who comes into a
court of justice to swear that what he had sworn before was false. A
man may often see reason, and he has too always the right of changing
his opinion; but this liberty does not extend to matters of fact.
I now come to the last scene, that of the ascension into heaven.—Here
all fear of the Jews, and of every thing else, must necessarily have
been out of the question: it was that which, if true, was to seal the
whole; and upon which the reality of the future mission of the
disciples was to rest for proof. Words, whether declarations or
promises, that passed in private, either in the recess of a mountain in
Galilee, or in a shut-up house in Jerusalem, even supposing them to
have been spoken, could not be evidence in public; it was therefore
necessary that this last scene should preclude the possibility of
denial and dispute; and that it should be, as I have stated in the
former part of ‘The Age of Reason,’ as public and as visible as the sun
at noon-day; at least it ought to have been as public as the
crucifixion is reported to have been.—But to come to the point.
In the first place, the writer of the book of Matthew does not say a
syllable about it; neither does the writer of the book of John. This
being the case, is it possible to suppose that those writers, who
affect to be even minute in other matters, would have been silent upon
this, had it been true? The writer of the book of Mark passes it off in
a careless, slovenly manner, with a single dash of the pen, as if he
was tired of romancing, or ashamed of the story. So also does the
writer of Luke. And even between these two, there is not an apparent
agreement, as to the place where this final parting is said to have
been. [The last nine verses of Mark being ungenuine, the story of the
ascension rests exclusively on the words in Luke xxiv. 51, “was carried
up into heaven,”—words omitted by several ancient authorities.—Editor.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account