The Writings of Thomas Paine — Volume 4 (1794-1796): The Age of ReasonPaine, Thomas
Religion
The Writings of Thomas Paine — Volume 4 (1794-1796): The Age of Reason
Paine, Thomas
Philosophy and religion; Political science; Rationalism
It would appear that Symonds’ stolen edition must have got ahead of
that sent by Paine to Franklin Bache, for some of its errors continue
in all modern American editions to the present day, as well as in those
of England. For in England it was only the shilling edition—that
revised by Paine—which was suppressed. Symonds, who ministered to the
half-crown folk, and who was also publisher of replies to Paine, was
left undisturbed about his pirated edition, and the new Society for the
suppression of Vice and Immorality fastened on one Thomas Williams, who
sold pious tracts but was also convicted (June 24, 1797) of having sold
one copy of the “Age of Reason.” Erskine, who had defended Paine at his
trial for the “Rights of Man,” conducted the prosecution of Williams.
He gained the victory from a packed jury, but was not much elated by
it, especially after a certain adventure on his way to Lincoln’s Inn.
He felt his coat clutched and beheld at his feet a woman bathed in
tears. She led him into the small book-shop of Thomas Williams, not yet
called up for judgment, and there he beheld his victim stitching tracts
in a wretched little room, where there were three children, two
suffering with Smallpox. He saw that it would be ruin and even a sort
of murder to take away to prison the husband, who was not a
freethinker, and lamented his publication of the book, and a meeting of
the Society which had retained him was summoned. There was a full
meeting, the Bishop of London (Porteus) in the chair. Erskine reminded
them that Williams was yet to be brought up for sentence, described the
scene he had witnessed, and Williams’ penitence, and, as the book was
now suppressed, asked permission to move for a nominal sentence. Mercy,
he urged, was a part of the Christianity they were defending. Not one
of the Society took his side,—not even “philanthropic” Wilberforce—and
Erskine threw up his brief. This action of Erskine led the Judge to
give Williams only a year in prison instead of the three he said had
been intended.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account