The Writings of Thomas Paine — Volume 4 (1794-1796): The Age of ReasonPaine, Thomas
Religion
The Writings of Thomas Paine — Volume 4 (1794-1796): The Age of Reason
Paine, Thomas
Philosophy and religion; Political science; Rationalism
In the former part of ‘The Age of Reason.’ I have called the creation
the true and only real word of God; and this instance, or this text, in
the book of creation, not only shows to us that this thing may be so,
but that it is so; and that the belief of a future state is a rational
belief, founded upon facts visible in the creation: for it is not more
difficult to believe that we shall exist hereafter in a better state
and form than at present, than that a worm should become a butterfly,
and quit the dunghill for the atmosphere, if we did not know it as a
fact.
As to the doubtful jargon ascribed to Paul in 1 Corinthians xv., which
makes part of the burial service of some Christian sectaries, it is as
destitute of meaning as the tolling of a bell at the funeral; it
explains nothing to the understanding, it illustrates nothing to the
imagination, but leaves the reader to find any meaning if he can. “All
flesh,” says he, “is not the same flesh. There is one flesh of men,
another of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds.” And what
then? nothing. A cook could have said as much. “There are also,” says
he, “bodies celestial and bodies terrestrial; the glory of the
celestial is one and the glory of the terrestrial is the other.” And
what then? nothing. And what is the difference? nothing that he has
told. “There is,” says he, “one glory of the sun, and another glory of
the moon, and another glory of the stars.” And what then? nothing;
except that he says that one star differeth from another star in glory,
instead of distance; and he might as well have told us that the moon
did not shine so bright as the sun. All this is nothing better than the
jargon of a conjuror, who picks up phrases he does not understand to
confound the credulous people who come to have their fortune told.
Priests and conjurors are of the same trade.
Sometimes Paul affects to be a naturalist, and to prove his system of
resurrection from the principles of vegetation. “Thou fool” says he,
“that which thou sowest is not quickened except it die.” To which one
might reply in his own language, and say, Thou fool, Paul, that which
thou sowest is not quickened except it die not; for the grain that dies
in the ground never does, nor can vegetate. It is only the living
grains that produce the next crop. But the metaphor, in any point of
view, is no simile. It is succession, and [not] resurrection.
The progress of an animal from one state of being to another, as from a
worm to a butterfly, applies to the case; but this of a grain does not,
and shows Paul to have been what he says of others, a fool.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account