The Yale Literary Magazine (Vol. I, No. 5, July 1836)Various
General
The Yale Literary Magazine (Vol. I, No. 5, July 1836)
Various
College students' writings, American -- Connecticut -- New Haven -- Periodicals; Yale University -- Periodicals
_Nescio._ “I am by no means satisfied that their view is not a correct
one. It seems to me that the allurements of poetry and the splendors of
romance are all lymphatic draughts to inebriate the mind, and, as ‘the
subtle blood of the grape,’ exalts and quickens the animal spirits,
only thereafter to retard and depress, so do these unearthly potations
elevate the soul, but leave it dull, drooping and disgusted. Especially
pernicious in their influence are the trashy productions of ephemeral
minds, which ‘dream false dreams and see lying visions,’ which clothe
the children of their fancy in perfections to which man is a stranger,
and fill the untaught soul with hopes and aspirations, which earth can
never realize. Byron certainly, and, I think, even Shakspeare, exert
an evil influence in their portraitures of character. Their actors are
so sublime, or so lovely, that they first inspire the mind with false
hope, and then fill it with vain despair.”
_Tristo._ “You speak the language of a half philosopher, who
generalizes a few isolated facts into an all-embracing theory. Even
Byron’s evil influence results not from the unnatural beauty of his
characters and scenery, but rather from the fact that he does not seem
to conceive of virtue even in the abstract; he no where shows regard
for aught but self, and no where recognizes even by accident a standard
of right and wrong. As for Shakspeare, nature is visible in all his
writings; virtue and vice are strangely mingled, even as among the
scenes and occurrences of life. If he ever deviates from the actual
and the known, it is either in the delineation of some creature of
professedly ideal existence, such as Ariel and Puck; or else in the
combination of circumstances which produces characters, that all will
allow to be natural, though such they have never seen in actual life
and motion.”
_Nescio._ “Suffer me for a moment to interrupt you, and ask what
is _nature_? Shakspeare is certainly more natural than most of his
successors, and yet, for the life of me I cannot point out the
difference, where it is, or in what it consists. For the incidents of
that great master are sometimes not merely improbable, but impossible.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account