The Yoga-Vasishtha Maharamayana of Valmiki, Vol. 1 (of 4) — John Shaqi
The Yoga-Vasishtha Maharamayana of Valmiki, Vol. 1 (of 4)Valmiki
Religion
The Yoga-Vasishtha Maharamayana of Valmiki, Vol. 1 (of 4)
Valmiki
Hinduism -- Doctrines -- Early works to 1800; Religious life -- Hinduism -- Early works to 1800
Krishna (under the conception of the identity of his soul with that of
the Divine), speaks of himself in the Bhágavadgítá that, he was the
letter _a_ of the alphabet, and the _Om_ of words (वर्णानामकारोऽहं शब्दानाञ्चोङ्कारः).
This is shown in the latest English translation of the work to be a
doctrine derived from Christianity and corresponds with the passage
“I am Alpha &c.” in the book of Revelations (Ch. I. V. 8). There is a
similar passage in the Koran which says “He (God) is the first; _Ho al
awl_ corresponding with the Greek” _Ho esten arche_; and this passage
and sometimes its initial Ὁ (Gr.) and our ॐ, is used by Moslems at the
top and commencement of their books and other writings. Again like
_Alpha_ of the holy Scripture we find the use of Alif upon the head of
all writings in Urdu, Persian, Arabic and Hebrew in daily practice.
Hence it is hard to say who is the borrower, though every one will
boast itself to be the lender. (_Vide_ Weber’s paper on the Rám Tap Up.
pp. 276, and 360).
[Sidenote: 3. An Initiatory Particle मङ्गलार्थ ।]
The Kosha adds the sense of auspiciousness and prosperity
(मङ्गलेशुभे) to the above, and this as we have already observed
forms like the names of gods, the initiatory vocable of meritorious
undertakings (आदाबोम शब्दः माङ्गलिकः). “_Om_” says the Ch’hándogya, “is also
prosperity” (I, 8.) To this the scholiast Sankara says; “the letter
_Om_ is called prosperity, because it is possessed of the property and
attribute of prosperity. The prosperous alone can pass the word _Om_”
(Chh. up. Ch. 1, p. 8).
Its use is not confined to the sacred and antiquated language of Vedic
writing and the liturgy, but is to be met with in the classic Sanskrit
of ancient bards and modern poets. Thus we have in the Rámáyana of our
author (रामायण ५ ।८१ ।११ । प्राज्यस्वर्विजयोङ्कारश्चक्रे). In this sense we discover a curious affinity of
the Aryan _Om_ with the Semitic _Áman_ _Amán_ and _Aiman_, as in the
Persian phrase _Aiman buád_ corresponding with ॐ or शुभं भूयात् ।
[Sidenote: 4. Gratulatory, Particle नमस्कारार्थः ।]
The word has been rendered in our translation by the salutatory
term “Hail”, from a supposed similarity of its meaning with that of
_namo_ नमस् which is used by women and Súdras in lieu of the
sacred _Om_ in their salutations to gods and superior beings, owing
to the denunciation pronounced upon their utterance of the sacred
syllable (स्त्रीशूद्रयोः प्रणवं नेच्छन्ति). We find its use in the same sense in Dr.
Roer’s Translation of the Aitareya Upanishad, where it is rendered
by “salutation to the Supreme Soul” and by “adoration” in Cowell’s
version of the Maitrí Upanishad. We are however at a loss of authority
to warrant our adoption of _namo_ as a synonym of _Om_. We meet with
instances of the use of _Om_ and _namo_ together to mean salutation,
as, ॐन्नमः शिबाय and शिबायोँ न्नमः in the Mugdhabodha, where _namo_,
expresses obeisance and governs शिबाय in the dative, and not
_Om_ which has no governing power.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account