The Yoga-Vasishtha Maharamayana of Valmiki, Vol. 1 (of 4)Valmiki
Religion
The Yoga-Vasishtha Maharamayana of Valmiki, Vol. 1 (of 4)
Valmiki
Hinduism -- Doctrines -- Early works to 1800; Religious life -- Hinduism -- Early works to 1800
From all our investigation into the origin, rise, and extent of meaning
of the word _Om_ in its orthography, etymology and theology, it is
evident that the Indo-Aryan mind was early infused with the idea of an
absolute _Om_ corresponding with the Greek _On_ and _ôn_, and _En_ and
also _Aeon_ of the Gnostics, Latin _Ens_, _Unum_ and Entity, Romance
_On_ and _un_, and _one_ in English, whose unity was the source of all
diversity in the plurality of creation, agreeably to the text _aham
bahu Syám_ = _Ego multus sim_ of the Sruti.
[Sidenote: 2. The Universal soul, = Vìswátman.]
It was at first known as _one_ and then as the _self_ or soul by the
silent and innate intuition of the intellect, as it is declared in the
Mandukya Upanishad II. 2, 5. तमेबैकंजानथआत्मानमन्यावाचो, बिमुञ्चथअमृतस्यैब सेतुः ।
मण्डूकं २ । २१५ ।
Max Müller says (A. S. Lit. p. 23 and p. 322): “The Átman was next
conceived as the Spirit = air, _átmá_ and _anime_.” “That one breathed
breathless by itself: other than it nothing since has been.” Thus says
the Sruti (Müller p. 560). “This one Átman (atmos) fills, animates and
pervades the whole”; as the poet sings “spreads unspent” throughout the
infinity of worlds:
“Which are but parts of one undivided whole
whose body nature is, and God the soul.” (Pope).
एकमेवाद्वितीयं ब्रह्म । रूपं रूपं प्रतिरूपं विभाति ॥
[Sidenote: 3. Called as _Tat_ = that]
The inherent one of all ones “_to on ontwn_,” the unit of unities, the
Ens of entities, the soul of the world “Viswátman” was yet without a
name, nor did they know how to call him, than by the designation of
_tat_ = “that,” which they say is expressive of the idea of Brahma
तदिति ब्रह्मणोऽभिधानमुदाहृतं । Because says Váchaspati, the nature of the one _Om_,
was unknown even to the learned बिदुषां परोक्षत्वाच्च तच्छब्दो ब्रह्मणो नाम; and therefore it was
specified by the demonstrative pronoun _that_ “_tat_,” which sometimes
preceded the एक as तदेकं &c. (Greek _to on_). The
necessity of pronouncing _Om_ with _tat sat_ in the beginning of every
Vedic rite, is strictly enjoined in Bhágavad-Gítá. ॐ तत्सदिति निर्द्देशो
ब्रह्मनस्त्रिविधः स्मृतः । ब्राह्मणश्चैब बेदाश्च यज्ञाश्चबिहिताः पुरा । बैदिके कर्म्मणि तेषां प्रथमतो निर्द्देशः । इति तां बाचस्पतिः ।
[Sidenote: 4. The Impersonal and Personal God.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account