During the seventh century the scattered teachers of _dhyana _seem to
have gradually coalesced into a sort of ad hoc movement--with sizable
followings growing up around the better-known figures. A certain amount
of respectability also emerged, if we can believe the references to
imperial notice that start appearing in the chronicles. It would seem
that the _dhyana_ or Ch'an movement became a more or less coherent
sect, a recognizable if loosely defined school of Buddhism. However,
what the movement apparently was striving to become was not so much a
branch of Buddhism in China as a Chinese version of Buddhism. The men
later remembered as the Third, Fourth, and Fifth Patriarchs have in
common a struggle to bend Buddhist thought to Chinese intellectual
requirements, to sinicize Buddhism. Whereas they succeeded only in
setting the stage for this transformation (whose realization would
await other hands), they did establish a personality pattern that would
set apart all later masters: a blithe irreverence that owed as much to
Chuang Tzu as to Bodhidharma.
When reading the biographies that follow, it is useful to keep in mind
that the explicit details may well have been cooked up in later years
to satisfy a natural Chinese yearning for anecdotes, with or without
supporting information. Yet the fact that the _dhyana _practitioners
eventually became a movement in need of a history is itself proof that
these men and their stories were not complete inventions. In any case,
they were remembered, honored, and quoted in later years as the
legendary founders of Ch'an.
SENG-TSAN, THE THIRD PATRIARCH (d. 606)
The question of the Second Patriarch Hui-k'o's successor was
troublesome even for the ancient Ch'an historians. The earliest version
of his biography (written in 645, before the sect of Ch'an and its need
for a history existed) declares, "Before [Hui-k'o] had established a
lineage he died, leaving no worthy heirs." When it later became
necessary for Ch'an to have an uninterrupted patriarchy, a revised
history was prepared which supplied him an heir named Seng-ts'an, to
whom he is said to have transmitted the doctrine.1 The story of their
meeting recalls Hui-k'o's first exchange with Bodhidharma, save that
the roles are reversed. The text implies that Seng-ts'an was suffering
from leprosy when he first encountered Hui-k'o, and that he implored
the Master for relief in a most un-Zenlike way, saying: "I am in great
suffering from this disease; please take away my sins."
Hui-k'o responded with, "Bring me your sins, and I will take them
away."
After a long silence, Seng-ts'an confessed, "I've looked, but I cannot
find them."
To which Hui-k'o replied, echoing Bodhidharma's classic rejoinder,
"Behold, you have just been cleansed."
Another version of the story says Hui-k'o greeted Seng-ts'an with the
words, "You are suffering from leprosy; why should you want to see me?"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account