The Zincali: An Account of the Gypsies of SpainBorrow, George
History
The Zincali: An Account of the Gypsies of Spain
Borrow, George
Romanies -- Languages; Romanies -- Spain
‘Who are the Gitános? I answer; these vile people first began to show
themselves in Germany, in the year 1417, where they call them Tartars or
Gentiles; in Italy they are termed Ciani. They pretend that they come
from Lower Egypt, and that they wander about as a penance, and to prove
this, they show letters from the king of Poland. They lie, however, for
they do not lead the life of penitents, but of dogs and thieves. A
learned person, in the year 1540, prevailed with them, by dint of much
persuasion, to show him the king’s letter, and he gathered from it that
the time of their penance was already expired; he spoke to them in the
Egyptian tongue; they said, however, as it was a long time since their
departure from Egypt, they did not understand it; he then spoke to them
in the vulgar Greek, such as is used at present in the Morea and
Archipelago; _some understood it_, others did not; so that as all did not
understand it, we may conclude that the language which they use is a
feigned one, {67} got up by thieves for the purpose of concealing their
robberies, like the jargon of blind beggars.’
Still more abundant, however, than the mixture of Greek, still more
abundant than the mixture of Sclavonian, is the alloy in the Gypsy
language, wherever spoken, of modern Persian words, which circumstance
will compel us to offer a few remarks on the share which the Persian has
had in the formation of the dialects of India, as at present spoken.
The modern Persian, as has been already observed, is a daughter of the
ancient Zend, and, as such, is entitled to claim affinity with the
Sanscrit, and its dialects. With this language none in the world would
be able to vie in simplicity and beauty, had not the Persians, in
adopting the religion of Mahomet, unfortunately introduces into their
speech an infinity of words of the rude coarse language used by the
barbaric Arab tribes, the immediate followers of the warlike Prophet.
With the rise of Islam the modern Persian was doomed to be carried into
India. This country, from the time of Alexander, had enjoyed repose from
external aggression, had been ruled by its native princes, and been
permitted by Providence to exercise, without control or reproof, the
degrading superstitions, and the unnatural and bloody rites of a religion
at the formation of which the fiends of cruelty and lust seem to have
presided; but reckoning was now about to be demanded of the accursed
ministers of this system for the pain, torture, and misery which they had
been instrumental in inflicting on their countrymen for the gratification
of their avarice, filthy passions, and pride; the new Mahometans were at
hand—Arab, Persian, and Afghan, with the glittering scimitar upraised,
full of zeal for the glory and adoration of the one high God, and the
relentless persecutors of the idol-worshippers. Already, in the four
hundred and twenty-sixth year of the Hegeira, we read of the destruction
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account