The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle [vol. 1 of 5] : $b Fossil mammaliaOwen, Richard
Science
The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle [vol. 1 of 5] : $b Fossil mammalia
Owen, Richard
Beagle Expedition (1831-1836); Mammals, Fossil; Paleontology -- South America; Zoology
Of the bones of the leg only the proximal end of the tibia is preserved;
but this is valuable, as shewing another well-marked difference between
the Scelidothere and Megathere; for whereas in the latter the fibula is
anchylosed with the tibia, this bone, in the Scelidothere, presents a
smooth flat oval articular surface, which is shewn in fig. 2. Pl. XXVII.
below the outer part of the head of the bone; from the size and
appearance of which, I infer, that the fibula would not have become
confluent with the tibia, even in the mature and full-grown animal.
The relative length of the fore and hind extremities cannot be precisely
determined from the present imperfect skeleton of the Scelidothere; but
there is good evidence for believing, that the fore extremity was the
shortest. The humerus is shorter than the femur by one-ninth part of the
latter bone; and the radius, which wants only the distal epiphysis, must
have been shorter than the humerus. Now the relative development of the
fore and hind legs is one of the points to be taken into consideration
in an attempt to determine the habits and nature of an extinct mammal.
In climbing animals the prehensile power is more essential to the hinder
than to the fore parts or extremities. In the leech the principal sucker
is in the tail; and higher organized climbers, in like manner, depend
mainly on their posterior claspers in descending trees, and hold on by
means of them whilst selecting the place for the next application of
those at the fore part of the body, whether their place be supplied by
the beak, as in the Maccaws, or the fore-feet or hands in the Mammalia.
But, although we perceive the hinder limbs to be the last to lose the
advantageous structure of the hand in the Quadrumanous species, and
notwithstanding that the tail is for this purpose sometimes specially
organized to serve as a prehensile instrument, yet we find that the
power of grasping the branches of trees by either legs or tail is never
maintained at the expense of undue bulk and weight of those organs. On
the contrary, as the fore-limbs are the main instruments in the active
exertions of climbing, so they are the strongest as well as the longest
in all the best climbers, and the weight of the body which they have to
drag along is diminished by dwarfish proportions of the hinder limbs, as
in the Orangs and the Sloths.
Can those huge quadrupeds have been destined to climb that had the
pelvis and hinder extremities more ponderous and bulky in proportion to
the fore parts of the body than in any other known existing or extinct
vertebrate animals?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account