The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle [vol. 1 of 5] : $b Fossil mammaliaOwen, Richard
Science
The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle [vol. 1 of 5] : $b Fossil mammalia
Owen, Richard
Beagle Expedition (1831-1836); Mammals, Fossil; Paleontology -- South America; Zoology
M. Lund expressly states that it is produced by a different structure
and arrangement of the tarsal bones, from that which exists in the
Sloth, but he does not specify the nature of this difference.
If the astragalus, which I have referred with doubt to the _Megalonyx_,
do not actually belong to that genus, it is evidently part of a very
closely allied species. Now this astragalus, as we have seen, resembles
most closely that of the Megatherium; and since we may infer that the
calcaneum, scaphoides, and cuboides had a like correspondence, the
inclination of the sole of the foot inwards must have been very slight,
as I have determined from examination of the structure and co-adaptation
of those bones in the incomplete skeleton of the Megatherium in the
London College of Surgeons. Such an inclination of the foot may be
conceived to have facilitated the bending of the long claws upon the
sole, during the ordinary progressive movements of the animal, but it is
quite insufficient to justify the conclusion, that it related to an
application of the hind-feet for the purposes of climbing.
It is not without interest again to call to mind the deviation of the
structure of the astragalus of the Scelidothere from the Megatherioid to
the Dasypodoid type of structure. For if the Megatherioid type of
structure had really been one suitable to the exigencies of climbing
quadrupeds, it might have been expected to have exhibited the scansorial
modifications more decidedly, as the species diminished in stature; but
as regards the instructive bone of the hind-foot, the modifications of
which we have just been considering, this is by no means the case.
DESCRIPTION OF A MUTILATED LOWER JAW OF THE
MEGALONYX JEFFERSONII.
In the preceding section an astralagus was described, which was regarded
as belonging possibly to the same Edentate species as the jaw figured
and described, p. 69, Pl. XVIII. and XIX., under the name of _Mylodon
Darwinii_; but the same correspondence,—that of relative size,—renders
it equally possible that this astragalus may belong to the species of
_Megalonyx_ to which the lower jaw now under consideration appertains.
There could be no doubt, from its structure, that it was the astragalus
of a gigantic species of the order _Bruta_, and of the _Megatherioid_
family, and more nearly allied to the Megathere than is the
Scelidothere, but sufficiently distinct from both.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account