The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle [vol. 1 of 5] : $b Fossil mammaliaOwen, Richard
Science
The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle [vol. 1 of 5] : $b Fossil mammalia
Owen, Richard
Beagle Expedition (1831-1836); Mammals, Fossil; Paleontology -- South America; Zoology
It has been usual to characterize the Megatherium, in conformity with
the concurrent descriptions of Bru, Cuvier, and D’Alton, by the dental
formula of _molares_ ⁴⁄₄ ⁴⁄₄, i. e. by the presence of four grinding
teeth on each side of the upper, as of the lower jaw. It was the
agreement of the excellent authorities above cited in this statement,
which induced Mr. Clift and myself to regard a single detached tooth,
which formed part of the valuable collection of remains of the
Megatherium deposited in the Hunterian Museum by Sir Woodbine Parish, as
being, from its comparatively small size, the tooth of either a younger
individual or of a smaller species of Megatherium. Upon clearing away
the matrix from the palatal and alveolar surface of one of the cranial
fragments of the Megatherium in Mr. Darwin’s collection, I was gratified
by the detection of the crown of a fifth molar, corresponding in size
and form with the detached tooth, above alluded to: its small size, and
its position have doubtless occasioned its being over-looked in the
cranium of the great skeleton at Madrid.
The anterior molar of the upper jaw presents a nearly semicircular
transverse section, with the angles rounded off; the three succeeding
teeth are four-sided, with the transverse somewhat exceeding the
antero-posterior diameter: they are rather longer and larger than the
first: the last molar is likewise four-sided, but presents a sudden
diminution of diameter, and is relatively broader. The following are the
respective dimensions of the upper maxillary teeth.
First Second Third Fourth Fifth
Molar. Molar. Molar. Molar. Molar.
In. Lines. In. Lines. In. Lines. In. Lines. In. Lines.
Length 8 6 9 4 9 4 8 7 5 2
Transverse 1 9 2 4 2 3 2 0 1 4
diameter
Antero-posterior 1 5 2 0 2 0 1 11 0 10
diameter
Besides the differences in size, the upper molars vary as to their
curvature: this difference is exhibited in the vertical section of these
teeth figured in Pl. XXXI. The convexity of the curve of the first,
second and third molars is directed forwards; the fourth is straight,
its anterior surface only describing a slight convexity in the vertical
direction; the fifth tooth is curved, but in a contrary direction to the
others; and the bases of the five molars thus present a general
convergence towards a point a little way behind the middle of the
series.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account