The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle [vol. 1 of 5] : $b Fossil mammaliaOwen, Richard
Science
The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle [vol. 1 of 5] : $b Fossil mammalia
Owen, Richard
Beagle Expedition (1831-1836); Mammals, Fossil; Paleontology -- South America; Zoology
Although the complication of the grinding surface by the inflection of
simple or straight folds of enamel is peculiarly characteristic of the
Rodent type, we must regard the number of molar teeth, and their
diminution of size as they advance towards the anterior part of the jaw,
in the Toxodon, as indicative of a deviation from that order, and an
approach to the Pachyderms. The common number of grinders in the upper
jaw of Rodent animals is eight, four on each side. In some genera, as
Lemmus, Mus, Cricetus, there are only three on each side, and in
Hydromys and Aulacodus, only two on each side. In Lepus, however, we
find six on each side of the upper, and five on each side of the lower
jaw. The Toxodon, like the Tapir and Hippopotamus, has seven on each
side of the upper jaw: the first in each of these species being the
smallest. It is worthy of notice, however, that the Capybara which
adheres to the Rodent type in the number of its molars, presents in the
vastly increased size, and additional number of component laminæ of the
posterior grinders, an approximation to the pachydermatous character
just adduced, and the bony palate at the same time presents an expansion
between these molars, offering a resemblance to the Toxodon which I have
not found in any other Rodent besides the Capybara.
The most important deviation from the Rodent structure presented by the
teeth, occurs in the direction of the reflected fold of enamel, and such
a deviation might have been inferred, even in the absence of the teeth,
from the structure of the articular surface, or glenoid cavity for the
reception of the condyle of the lower jaw. As the ridge of enamel runs,
as above described, in a direction approaching that of the longitudinal
axis of the skull, it is obvious that the grinding motions of the lower
jaw should be in a proportionate degree in the transverse direction. The
glenoid cavity, therefore, instead of being a longitudinal groove, and
open behind, as in the true Rodents, is extended transversely, and is
defended behind by a broad descending bony process preventing the
retraction of the jaw, and showing marks of the forcible pressure to
which it was subject.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account