The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle [vol. 1 of 5] : $b Fossil mammalia — John Shaqi
The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle [vol. 1 of 5] : $b Fossil mammaliaOwen, Richard
Science
The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle [vol. 1 of 5] : $b Fossil mammalia
Owen, Richard
Beagle Expedition (1831-1836); Mammals, Fossil; Paleontology -- South America; Zoology
The _intermaxillary_ bones (D, Pls. II. and III.), though large, are
relatively of less extent than in the Rodents generally. The nasal
processes do not reach the frontal bone, but are limited to the anterior
half of the nasal boundary; approaching in this respect to the
Herbivorous Cetacea. In the outward expansion of their anterior
extremities, the intermaxillaries resemble those of the Hippopotamus, in
which, however, this character is more strongly marked. The
intermaxillaries in the Hippopotamus are also much less firmly united to
the maxillary bones than in the Toxodon, and are consequently commonly
lost in the fossil crania. On the palatal surface of the intermaxillary
bones there are two grooves which diverge forwards from the line of the
suture; and anteriorly to these grooves there are the two large anterior
palatine foramina. The maxillo-intermaxillary sutures on the palate
converge as they extend backwards to a point; there appears to have been
a fissure left between this suture and the mesial suture of the
intermaxillaries; in which structure the Toxodon resembles the
Hippopotamus.
After summing up the different affinities, or indications of affinity,
which are deducible from the cranium of this most curious and
interesting fossil mammal, we are led to the conclusion, assuming it to
have had extremities cased in hoofs, that it is referrible to the Order
Pachydermata. But the structure, form, and kind of teeth in the upper
jaw, prove, indisputably, that the gigantic Toxodon was intimately
related to the Rodent Order. From the characters of this order, as
afforded by the existing species, the Toxodon, however, differs in the
relative position of the supernumerary incisors, and in the number, and
direction of the curvature, of the molars. If, moreover, the lower jaw,
next to be described, belong, as I believe, to the Toxodon, the dental
character of the genus will be _incisors_ ⁴⁄₆; _pro laniariis diastema_;
_molares_ ⁷⁄₇ ⁷⁄₇.
The Toxodon again deviates from the true Rodentia, and resembles the
Wombat, and the Pachyderms, in the transverse direction of the articular
cavity of the lower jaw.
It deviates from the Rodentia, and resembles the Pachydermata in the
relative position of the glenoid cavities and zygomatic arches, and in
many minor details already alluded to.
In the aspect of the plane of the occipital foramen, and occipital
region of the skull; in the form and position of the occipital condyles;
in the aspect of the plane of the anterior bony aperture of the
nostrils; and in the thickness and texture of the osseous parietes of
the skull, the Toxodon deviates both from the Rodentia and existing
Pachydermata, and manifests an affinity to the Dinotherium and Cetaceous
Order, especially the Herbivorous section.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account