The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle [vol. 1 of 5] : $b Fossil mammaliaOwen, Richard
Science
The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle [vol. 1 of 5] : $b Fossil mammalia
Owen, Richard
Beagle Expedition (1831-1836); Mammals, Fossil; Paleontology -- South America; Zoology
The proximal articular surface or sigmoid cavity of the antibrachium,
constituted as above described, resembles that of the Palæothere, Tapir,
and the generality of the Pachyderms in having two depressions, instead
of three, as in the Anoplothere, and Ruminants. The Hippopotamus has a
slight tendency to the latter structure, which is also less marked in
the Camel than in the ordinary Ruminants. In its general form the
sigmoid cavity of the Macrauchene resembles that of the Hippopotamus
more than that of the Camel. In the Camel this articular surface is
traversed transversely by a broad, shallow, and slightly roughened
tract, which divides the smooth surface of the joint into two parts, one
forming the anterior horizontal surface due to the conjoined radius and
ulna, the other forming the vertical concave surface on the anterior
part of the base of the olecranon. In the Hippopotamus there is, as it
were, an attempt at a similar division of the articulating surface at
the proximal end of the antibrachial bones; a deeper and rougher
depression encroaches upon the articulation from its outer side, but
stops when it has reached half-way across. In the Macrauchenia the
roughened surface, (_b_. fig. 1, Pl. X.) commencing also at the outside,
extends only one-third of the way across the articular surface: it is,
however, as shallow as in the Camel. The articular surface on the
anterior part of the base of the olecranon is broader in the
Hippopotamus than in the Camel; but in the Macrauchene it is twice as
broad as in the Hippopotamus. The size of the olecranon in the
Macrauchene exceeds that of the Hippopotamus, and _à fortiori_ that of
the Camel: indeed in its general magnitude the Macrauchenia must have
fully equalled the largest Hippopotamus; but it no doubt had a more
shapely, and less broad and bulky trunk. The olecranon of the
Macrauchenia differs in shape, both from that of the Camel and
Hippopotamus; it terminates above in a three-sided cone with an obtuse
apex; and presents a well-marked protuberance at the outer side of the
base, which is not present in either the Camel or Hippopotamus. There is
also a strong rugged ridge on the back part of the olecranon which makes
an angle before sinking into the level of the ulna below.
The confirmation of the close affinity of the Macrauchenia to the
Pachydermatous Order, which the structure of the cervical vertebræ alone
might have rendered very doubtful, is afforded by the bones of the right
fore-foot (Pl. XI.); these are fortunately in so perfect a condition, as
to make it certain that this interesting quadruped had three toes on the
fore-feet, and not more; and that the fully developed metacarpal bones
are distinct, and correspond in number with the toes, and are not
anchylosed into a single cannon bone, as in the Ruminants. The bones
preserved are the metacarpals, proximal phalanges, and middle phalanges
of each of the three toes, and the distal phalanx of the innermost toe.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account