The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle [vol. 3 of 5] : $b BirdsGould, John
Science
The zoology of the voyage of H.M.S. Beagle [vol. 3 of 5] : $b Birds
Gould, John
Beagle Expedition (1831-1836); Birds; Zoology
It will be seen, that the three last species of the genus Mimus, were
procured from the Galapagos Archipelago; and as there is a fact,
connected with their geographical distribution, which appears to me of
the highest interest, I have had these three figured. There are five
large islands in this Archipelago, and several smaller ones. I
fortunately happened to observe, that the specimens which I collected in
the two first islands we visited, differed from each other, and this
made me pay particular attention to their collection. I found that all
in Charles Island belonged to _M. trifasciatus_; all in Albemarle Island
to _M. parvulus_, and all in Chatham and James’s Islands to _M.
melanotus_. I do not rest this fact solely on my own observation, but
several specimens were brought home in the Beagle, and they were found,
according to their species, to have come from the islands as above
named. Charles Island is distant fifty miles from Chatham Island, and
thirty-two from Albemarle Island. This latter is only ten miles from
James Island, yet the many specimens procured from both belonged
respectively to different species. James and Chatham, which possess the
same species, are seventy miles apart, but Indefatigable Island is
situated between them, which perhaps, has afforded a means of
communication. The fact, that islands in sight of each other, should
thus possess peculiar species, would be scarcely credible, if it were
not supported by some others of an analogous nature, which I have
mentioned in my Journal of the Voyage of the Beagle. I may observe, that
as some naturalists may be inclined to attribute these differences to
local varieties; that if birds so different as _O. trifasciatus_, and
_O. parvulus_, can be considered as varieties of one species, then the
experience of all the best ornithologists must be given up, and whole
genera must be blended into one species. I cannot myself doubt that _M.
trifasciatus_, and _M. parvulus_ are as distinct species as any that can
be named in one restricted genus.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account