Nor is it at all sure that everything would be fine if there were no
parties. Countries which have tried to do without parties, have not
made a great success of it. There must be some organized group to hold
responsible if men in office do badly; some people to warn that the
things they are doing are not approved by the majority of the people.
With parties in existence, as they have been for almost all of our
history as a nation, there are in the main, four ways in which a man
may act toward them. He may be a hidebound party man, always voting the
party ticket, and swallowing the party platforms whole. Such persons
often get into the newspapers when they are elderly, as having voted
for every candidate on this or that party ticket for fifty or sixty or
seventy years. It simply means, of course, that these men are proud of
the fact that they let other people do their thinking for them.
Or, a man may look upon a party as the means through which he may
secure better government. He is proud of its wise and good acts, and is
willing to forgive its mistakes, because he knows that no large group
of men can be perfect. He believes in remaining loyal to his party as
long as possible, but he does not set it above his country, nor agree
to follow it when it goes absolutely wrong, or falls into the hands of
men who hold party welfare above patriotism. Roosevelt was a party man
of this kind.
Furthermore, a man may be an Independent, one who will not join any
party for long. Many of these are highly honorable and wise citizens,
who are of great value to the country, although they can usually be
nothing but helpers in any good cause. Their position nearly always
prevents their becoming the chief actors in bringing about any good and
desirable reform.
The fourth class in which a man may find himself in regard to parties,
is that of the so-called independent, who mistakes his own fussiness
for nobility of character. He can find fault with everybody and every
party, but he can be loyal to none. He is strong on leaving a party for
the smallest excuse; never on staying with it. It is as if a member
of a foot-ball team, half an hour before the game, should refuse to
play, because some other member of the team had once cheated in an
examination. He satisfies his own conscience, but he fails in the
loyalty he owes to the team and its friends.
At the convention in 1884 Roosevelt took an important part for so
young a man. He made speeches and worked for Senator Edmunds, but Mr.
Blaine was nominated. This caused a split in the party, and many of
its members joined the Democrats. They were called by their opponents
"Mugwumps," and since they believed they were acting for the best, they
did not mind being called that or any other name.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account