Theodore Savage: A Story of the Past or the FutureHamilton, Cicely
Science
Theodore Savage: A Story of the Past or the Future
Hamilton, Cicely
Apocalyptic fiction; End of the world -- Fiction; Regression (Civilization) -- Fiction; Science fiction
The command, the prohibition, had suddenly a new significance. Was this,
then, the purport of a legend hitherto meaningless? Was this the truth
behind the childish symbol? The deadly truth that knowledge is power of
destruction—power of destruction too great for the human, the fallible,
to wield?... Odd that he had never thought of it before—that, familiar
all his life with a deadly truth, he had read it as primitive
childishness!
“Of the Tree of the Knowledge of good and evil thou shalt not eat ...
lest ye die....”
He sat numbly repeating the words half aloud till there flashed into his
brain a memory, a vision of Markham. In his room off Great Smith Street
on the night when war was declared—talking rapidly with his mouth full
of biscuit. “Only one thing I’m fairly certain about—I ought to have
been strangled at birth.... If the human animal must fight, it should
kill off its scientific men. Stamp out the race of ’em!”... What was
that but a paraphrase, a modern application of the command laid upon
Adam. “Of the Tree of the Knowledge of good and evil thou shalt not
eat ... lest ye die.”
To his first impulse—of amazement and shrinking, as from
treason—succeeded understanding of the outlook of these men and their
decision. More, he wondered why, even in the worst of his despair, he
had always believed in the persistence, the re-birth, of the
civilization that had bred him.... These people—he saw it—were logical,
as Markham had been logical—were wise after the event as Markham had
been wise before it; and it amazed him that in his porings and guessings
at a world reviving he had never hit upon their simple solution of the
eternal problem of war. Markham’s solution; which, till this moment, he
had not taken literally.... “You can’t combine the practice of science
and the art of war; in the end it’s one or the other. We, I think, are
going to prove that—very definitely.” One or the other. The fighting
instinct or knowledge!
Man, because he fights, must deny himself knowledge—which is power over
the forces of nature; the secrets of nature must be veiled from him by
his own ignorance—lest, when the impulse to strife wells up in him, they
serve him for infinite destruction. These renegades, in agony, had made
confession of their sin, of the corporate sin of a world; had faced the
brutality of their own nature; had denied themselves the fruit of the
Tree of Knowledge, and led themselves out of temptation. Since fight
they must, being men with men’s passions, they would limit their powers
of destruction.... So he read their strange self-denying ordinance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account