Theory & History of HistoriographyCroce, Benedetto
Philosophy
Theory & History of Historiography
Croce, Benedetto
Historiography
Philosophy, in consequence of the new relation in which it has been
placed, cannot of necessity be anything but the _methodological moment
of historiography_: a dilucidation of the categories constitutive
of historical judgments, or of the concepts that direct historical
interpretation. And since historiography has for content the concrete
life of the spirit, and this life is life of imagination and of
thought, of action and of morality (or of something else, if anything
else can be thought of), and in this variety of its forms remains
always one, the dilucidation moves in distinguishing between æsthetic
and logic, between economic and ethic, uniting and dissolving them
all in the philosophy of the spirit. If a philosophical problem shows
itself to be altogether sterile for the historical judgment, we have
there the proof that such problem is otiose, badly stated, and in
reality does not exist. If the solution of a problem--that is to
say, of a philosophical proposition--instead of making history more
intelligible, leaves it obscure or confounds it with others, or leaps
over it and lightly condemns or negates it, we have there the proof
that such proposition and the philosophy with which it is connected
are arbitrary, though it may preserve interest in other respects, as a
manifestation of sentiment or of imagination.
The definition of philosophy as 'methodology' is not at first exempt
from doubts, even on the part of one ready to accept in general the
tendency that it represents; because philosophy and methodology are
terms often contrasted, and a philosophy that leads to a methodology
is apt to be tainted with empiricism. But certainly the methodology
of which we are here speaking is not at all empirical; indeed, it
appears just for the purpose of correcting and taking the place of the
empirical methodology of professional historians and of other such
specialists in all that greater part of it where it is a true and
proper, though defective, attempt toward the philosophical solution
of the theoretical problems raised by the study of history, or toward
philosophical methodology and philosophy as methodology.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account