They Who Knock at Our Gates: A Complete Gospel of ImmigrationAntin, Mary
History
They Who Knock at Our Gates: A Complete Gospel of Immigration
Antin, Mary
Noncitizens -- United States; United States -- Emigration and immigration
[ Transcriber's Notes:
Every effort has been made to replicate this text as faithfully
as possible, including inconsistencies in spelling and hyphenation.
Some corrections of spelling and punctuation have been made. They
are listed at the end of the text.
Italic text has been marked with _underscores_.
]
By Mary Antin
THEY WHO KNOCK AT OUR GATES. Illustrated.
THE PROMISED LAND. Illustrated.
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY
Boston and New York
THEY WHO KNOCK AT OUR GATES
[Illustration: THE SINEW AND BONE OF ALL THE NATIONS]
THEY WHO KNOCK
AT OUR GATES
A COMPLETE
GOSPEL OF IMMIGRATION
BY
MARY ANTIN
WITH ILLUSTRATIONS BY
JOSEPH STELLA
BOSTON AND NEW YORK
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY
The Riverside Press Cambridge
1914
COPYRIGHT, 1914, BY THE PHILLIPS PUBLISHING COMPANY
COPYRIGHT, 1914, BY HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Published May 1914
CONTENTS
Introduction ix
I. The Law of the Fathers 1
II. Judges in the Gate 31
III. The Fiery Furnace 99
ILLUSTRATIONS
The sinew and bone of all the nations (page 63) Frontispiece
Rough work and low wages for the immigrant 64
The ungroomed mother of the East Side 72
A fresh infusion of pioneer blood 108
INTRODUCTION
Three main questions may be asked with reference to immigration--
_First:_ A question of principle: Have we any right to regulate
immigration?
_Second:_ A question of fact: What is the nature of our present
immigration?
_Third:_ A question of interpretation: Is immigration good for us?
The difficulty with the first question is to get its existence
recognized. In a matter that has such obvious material aspects as
the immigration problem the abstract principles involved are likely
to be overlooked. But as there can be no sound conclusions without a
foundation in underlying principles, this discussion must begin by
seeking an answer to the ethical question involved.
The second question is not easy to answer for the reason that men are
always poor judges of their contemporaries, especially of those whose
interests appear to clash with their own. We suffer here, too, from
a bewildering multiplicity of testimony. Every sort of expert whose
specialty in any way touches the immigrant has diagnosed the subject
according to the formulæ of his own special science--and our doctors
disagree! One is forced to give up the luxury of a second-hand opinion
on this subject, and to attempt a little investigation of one's own,
checking off the dicta of the specialists as well as an amateur may.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account