In early October, 1848, McGee arrived in Philadelphia, and before the
close of the month he was in the exciting swirl of American
journalism. He established the _New York Nation_, patterned much
after the Dublin _Nation_. It was frankly an Irish-American organ
which gave special attention to the politics of Ireland, and to the
means whereby Irishmen in the new world might advance the interests
of their native country. It was written with that intense bitterness
towards Britain characteristic of the journals of most exiled
Irishmen. It is interesting to find the man who in 1868 was
described by Lord Mayo as "the most eloquent advocate of British rule
on the face of the world" vowing in 1848 to dedicate all his days to
the ruin of British power. But McGee's opinions were to travel a
changeful journey between these two dates.
His prospects in New York were promising. Although young, he had
already a wide reputation as an Irish leader, and a large population
in New York and the neighbouring states was prepared to support his
paper. But youthful rashness damaged his prospective success. Soon
after his arrival in America, he wrote some public letters
attributing the failure of the Irish revolutionary movement to the
influence of the clergy. He argued that they were primarily
responsible for the fact that the peasantry had not risen at the
critical moment. Such a reflection upon the patriotism of the Irish
clergy brought into the field against McGee an experienced and
formidable controversialist in Bishop Hughes of New York. The bishop
had proved his steel in many a public duel, and his ardent Irish
patriotism had given him a vast prestige over his flock. Having
closely followed affairs in Ireland, he was well prepared to meet
McGee's challenge. He argued that blame for the failure of the
insurrection must not be placed upon the clergy, but upon the leaders
of Young Ireland, prominent among whom was McGee himself. They had
precipitated a rebellion for which they had made no serviceable
preparation, and thus exposed the peasantry to destruction by British
soldiery. The priests, by restraining their flocks from rebellion,
had alone saved them from disaster. Bishop Hughes was not content
with such argument. He denounced McGee as being faithless to his
church and creed, which elicited from the latter the reply that "My
crime is not that I do not believe in the creed of my fathers and my
affections, but that I have failed to pay my court to some great
unknown who sits chafing on his chair, impatient of his daily dose of
honied praises."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account