There is something in parliamentary life that appeals to the fighting
instinct, and men in opposition feel more free to indulge in it.
McGee did so with undisguised recklessness. In the opinion of
sober-minded people he seemed over-ready to engage in the battles of
debate. One of the most controversial questions of the period was
the choice of a site for the government. Up to 1858 the capital had
been shunted about almost in the manner of a freight car, remaining
at the most only four years in any one city. Such an arrangement was
obviously not satisfactory. Yet there was real difficulty in
deciding which of the rival cities should be the permanent capital.
Quebec, Montreal, Kingston, Toronto, Hamilton--all had their
advocates who fought for their respective centres with the public
enthusiasm of men whose parliamentary seats depended upon the extent
to which they promoted local interests. A decision in favour of any
one city might spell the death of the ministry. The
Macdonald-Cartier government of 1858, unwilling to enter an early
grave, hit upon an expedient which might remove responsibility from
their heads. They passed a resolution requesting the Queen to choose
among the rival cities. The Queen or her ministers could have little
knowledge of the respective merits of the various Canadian cities,
and it is likely that she acted on advice from Canada. In any case
she decided in favour of a village, Bytown, in the backwoods of the
Ottawa river. From a ragged settlement, in the country of lumbermen,
the village has since grown into the beautiful Ottawa. The
Opposition was up in arms against the Queen's decision. McGee, who
was frankly a champion of Montreal, flung himself into the debate,
pleading the advantages of Lower Canada's largest city.
The final upshot was the resignation of the government, and the
calling of Brown and Dorion to form a ministry. Then occurred the
famous incident in Canadian history known as the Double Shuffle. The
governor, Sir Edmund Head, refused Brown the privilege of a
dissolution whereby the Reform leader might have obtained a more
substantial majority. To add to the latter's misfortunes, the
Opposition without giving the Reform ministry a trial carried a vote
of censure. The new ministry, only a few hours old, was thus forced
out of power, and Cartier and Macdonald were once more called upon.
Constitutional precedent required that the ministers upon accepting
office should seek re-election. But Macdonald feared that the
ministers from Upper Canada would not be returned, if at this
juncture they faced their constituents. Hence the ministers by
shuffling their offices made use of a legal technicality to avoid
re-election, and carried on the government as if nothing had occurred
to disturb their former possession of power.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account