Thomas Hariot, the Mathematician, the Philosopher and the ScholarStevens, Henry
Philosophy
Thomas Hariot, the Mathematician, the Philosopher and the Scholar
Stevens, Henry
Harriot, Thomas, 1560-1621; Hercules Club
The Berlin paper immediately upon publication was translated into
English and extensively circulated in this country, conducing, it is
suspected, more to the renown of Dr Zach than to that of Hariot. In
1793 Bode’s Jahrbuch gave from the pen of Dr Zach an account of the
Comets of 1607 and 1618, with Hariot’s Observations thereon. But these
observations were given with so many errors and misreadings, as shown
by Professor Rigaud, that they were soon pronounced worthless, to the
discredit of Hariot rather than of his eminent editor. But matters came
to a crisis in 1794, nine years after the grand flourish of the first
announcement at Berlin. Dr Zach sent to Oxford for publication his
abstract of certain of the scientific papers, and the Earl of Egremont
intrusted to the University Dr Zach’s selection of the original papers.
Zach’s abstracts were merely sufficient to identify himself with the
works of Hariot, but he had performed no real editorial labours, and
had not ‘pen’d the doctrine’ contained in them. Here were years of
useful work to be done which the University dreamed not of, so the
whole matter was referred to Professors Robertson and Powell, who both
reported adversely in 1798, or before. In 1799 all the Hariot papers
were returned to Petworth.
In the mean time the full translation of Dr Zach’s account of his
‘discovery,’ with some curious additions, found its way into Dr
Hutton’s Dictionary of Mathematics, under Hariot, 1796, 2 volumes in
quarto. This publication gave an air of solemn record and history to
the transactions, insomuch that Oxford began to be blamed for
withholding from the press Dr Zach’s great work. Oxford preserved a
becoming silence. In 1803 Dr Zach published at Gotha in his Monatliche
Correspondenz a fragment of that remarkable letter from the Earl of
Northumberland to Hariot (which letter we have shown to be Lower’s, see
p. 120). This publication, together with the reprint of the original
Berlin paper by Zach in the second edition of Hutton’s Dictionary in
1815 without alteration, seemed to bring the matter to a point. Oxford
was obliged to rise and explain.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account