Thomas Paine, the Apostle of Liberty: An Address Delivered in Chicago, January 29, 1916; Including the Testimony of Five Hundred WitnessesRemsburg, John E. (John Eleazer)
History
Thomas Paine, the Apostle of Liberty: An Address Delivered in Chicago, January 29, 1916; Including the Testimony of Five Hundred Witnesses
Remsburg, John E. (John Eleazer)
Paine, Thomas, 1737-1809
"The 'commonly believed outrageous action' [quoting Torrey] of Thomas
Paine in living with another man's wife was shown to have been the
kindly hospitality shown by an old man of sixty-seven to the refugee
family of his French benefactor. The only man who had ever imputed a
shadow of obloquy to Paine in this connection went into the witness-box
after Paine's death and solemnly swore that there was no foundation for
his calumny."
The basis of this calumny was one of the many noble acts of Paine's
life. When it became known that Napoleon had designs against the
liberties of France, and was planning to elevate himself to power, Paine
and Bonneville opposed him. Concerning the results of this rupture Stead
quotes from Conway as follows:
"In return Bonaparte suppressed Bonneville's paper, threw Bonneville
into prison and placed Paine in surveillance. Afterwards by the
intervention of the American minister Paine was permitted to leave the
country. Bonneville was forbidden to quit France. A year after Paine
crossed the Atlantic Madame Bonneville with her children escaped to
America.... So far from Paine having taken Bonneville's wife away from
her husband, he did everything to induce Napoleon to free Bonneville
from surveillance and to allow him to rejoin his wife in New York."
Stead finally forced Torrey to eat his words and to make the following
retraction: "It is the obligation of those who make the charges to prove
them, and to my mind this particular charge against Paine has not been
proven."
M. and Madame Bonneville had befriended Paine, had invited him to their
home where for years he enjoyed their hospitality. When Bonneville was
imprisoned and impoverished and his family reduced to penury, Paine
would have been a base ingrate had he not befriended them.
Dr. Lucy Waite: "The one circumstance in the life of Thomas Paine that
to my mind more than any other reflects credit upon him as a man,
has been made the target of the most bitter attacks against him--his
relations to Madame Bonneville.... His detractors would no doubt have
considered it a more 'moral' act if he had sent them to the poor-farm
instead of to his own farm at New Rochelle; but to the everlasting
credit of this great man he defied the town gossips, and made them
comfortable in his own home."
Slanders concerning Paine's marital troubles have been published. He
was married twice before coming to America, in 1759 to Mary Lambert, who
died, and in 1771 to Elizabeth Olive, from whom he was separated. The
separation was by mutual consent and nothing discreditable to either
party was alleged. As to the cause of the separation all that is known,
or rather surmised, is stated in McClintock and Strong's Cyclopedia, an
Orthodox authority: "His first wife had died about a year after
their marriage; he lived about three years with his second, when they
separated by mutual consent, it is said, on account of her physical
disability."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account