Thomas Paine, the Apostle of Liberty: An Address Delivered in Chicago, January 29, 1916; Including the Testimony of Five Hundred WitnessesRemsburg, John E. (John Eleazer)
History
Thomas Paine, the Apostle of Liberty: An Address Delivered in Chicago, January 29, 1916; Including the Testimony of Five Hundred Witnesses
Remsburg, John E. (John Eleazer)
Paine, Thomas, 1737-1809
Paine's subsequent treatment of his wife was in the highest degree
honorable. He had but little property, but what he had he gave to her.
Regarding his conduct in this matter Clio Rickman, his most intimate
friend in England, and a highly honorable man, bears this testimony:
"This I can assert, that Mr. Paine always spoke tenderly and
respectfully of his wife; and sent her several times pecuniary aid,
without her knowing even whence it came."
Concerning this slander W. T. Stead says: "No one even among Paine's
worst libelers suggests that she had any reason of complaint against
him." One of Paine's calumniators, "Francis Oldys" (George Chalmers), a
pretended biographer of Paine whose statements are nearly all false or
misleading, says that while he was an excise officer he bought smuggled
tobacco and was dismissed from the service for the offense. This
statement is false. Dr. Conway says:
"I have before me the minutes of the Board concerning Paine, and there
is no hint whatever of any such accusation."
Falsehoods generally grow rather than diminish with age, and now we are
told that Paine himself was a smuggler and was dismissed for smuggling.
The Excise laws were the most odious laws in England, odious alike to
the people and to the excise officers, who were underpaid (fifty pounds
a year) and otherwise mistreated. Paine espoused the cause of his
fellow excisemen and in a memorial addressed to Parliament pleaded for
a redress of their grievances. His activity in this matter offended
the Government and a trivial irregularity commonly practiced by the
excisemen was made a pretext for his dismissal.
The Everyman Encyclopedia: "Became an excise officer, but agitating for
the removal of grievances, was dismissed from the service."
Had Paine been discharged for any dishonest or immoral act Franklin
would have known it and would not have recommended him as "a worthy
young man."
Paine's dismissal was for him, for England, for America and for the
world one of the most fortunate things that ever occurred. His loss of
the excise office which occurred in April, 1774, took him to America in
November of the same year. The independence of the United States and the
agitation in behalf of popular government throughout the civilized world
followed as a result.
Rev. Willet Hicks, a Quaker minister, who was with Paine when he died,
testified that emissaries of the church tried to bribe him to slander
Paine. He says: "I could have had any sums if I would have said anything
against Thomas Paine, or if even I would have consented to remain
silent. They informed me that the doctor was willing to say something
that would satisfy them if I would engage to be silent. Mr. Paine was a
good man--an honest man."
Rev. G. H. Humphrey: "He was honest. Nor was he uncharitable. He
abstained from profanity and rebuked it in others."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account