Thomas Paine, the Apostle of Liberty: An Address Delivered in Chicago, January 29, 1916; Including the Testimony of Five Hundred WitnessesRemsburg, John E. (John Eleazer)
History
Thomas Paine, the Apostle of Liberty: An Address Delivered in Chicago, January 29, 1916; Including the Testimony of Five Hundred Witnesses
Remsburg, John E. (John Eleazer)
Paine, Thomas, 1737-1809
"Paine wrote the 'Age of Reason' in Paris some years after Franklin
was dead.... The letter called the letter of Franklin to Paine bears no
address or date or signature. It may not have been written by Franklin
to anybody. The evangelists who cite this letter intend to convey the
impression that the 'Tiger' means unbelief. The indication is that the
writer had in his mind the beast of fanaticism and detraction. That
tiger was let loose by the 'Age of Reason' against its author, and the
animal and its whelps are still with us."--_George E. Macdonald._
Another Franklin myth is that concerning Franklin's motion for prayers
in the Convention that framed our Constitution. The Convention, it is
claimed, had labored for weeks without accomplishing anything when, at
Franklin's suggestion, its sessions were opened with prayer, after
which its work was speedily performed. While Franklin's proposal was not
inconsistent with his Deistic belief it was not adopted. There was not a
prayer offered from the opening to the close of the Convention. Franklin
himself says: "The Convention, except three or four persons, thought
prayers unnecessary."
Washington, Jefferson, Franklin and Paine were four of the greatest and
noblest of men. All held substantially the same religious opinions. All
were Deists. All rejected Christianity. Yet Washington, Jefferson and
Franklin are held in grateful remembrance, while Paine has been reviled
as no other man has been reviled. How do we account for this? Paine's
mere rejection of Christianity does not account for it.
The "Age of Reason" was suppressed by the government in England. In
America it could not be suppressed by law. The only way the clergy could
suppress it here was to resort to slander, to cover its author's name
with obloquy and make him appear so vile that no respectable bookseller
would dare to sell it and no respectable reader dare to read it.
"In England it was easy for Paine's chief antagonist, the bishop of
Llandaff [Watson] to rebuke Paine's strong language, when his lordship
could sit serenely in the House of Peers with knowledge that his
opponent was answered with handcuffs for every Englishman who sold his
book. But in America slander had to take the place of handcuffs."--_Dr.
Conway._
Henry A. Beers: "His book was denounced from a hundred pulpits and
copies of it were carefully locked away from the sight of 'the young,'
whose religious beliefs it might undermine."
James B. Elliott, of Philadelphia, says he well remembers the "time when
it was impossible to obtain the 'Age of Reason' except under cover
of the greatest secrecy and when he who was known to have read it was
shunned as a dangerous person."
Hugh O. Pentecost: "Paine's offense was not that he was an Infidel, but
that he made his meaning so clear that the common people could become
Infidels, too."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account