Thomas Paine, the Apostle of Liberty: An Address Delivered in Chicago, January 29, 1916; Including the Testimony of Five Hundred WitnessesRemsburg, John E. (John Eleazer)
History
Thomas Paine, the Apostle of Liberty: An Address Delivered in Chicago, January 29, 1916; Including the Testimony of Five Hundred Witnesses
Remsburg, John E. (John Eleazer)
Paine, Thomas, 1737-1809
"It is true that Paine was Republican and Deist, an enemy of kings
and churches. But many men of great and undimmed honor held the same
principles: Washington, Jefferson and Franklin and others of the
'Fathers' were Deists, and in England that creed was even fashionable in
certain aristocratic quarters. Paine's real sin was not that he preached
Deism in the land of Bolingbroke, Hume and Gibbon,... but that he
succeeded for the first time in inoculating the people with his
heresies."--_The Nation, London._
"Mimnermus," an English writer, says: "There were critics of the Bible,
it is true, before Paine's day, but they were mainly scholars whose
works were not easily understood by ordinary folk. Paine himself, a man
of genius, had sprung from the people, and he spoke their tongue and
made their thoughts articulate."
"Paine held that the people at large had the right of access to all new
ideas, and he wrote so as to reach the people. Hence, his book must be
suppressed."--_Prof. J. B. Bury, LL.D._
John S. Crosby: "The reason why his writings are excluded from our
colleges is not on account of what he said about the _prophets_, but for
fear that the realization of his ideas may diminish the _profits_."
"Recognizing the magic influence that a great name carries with it, the
clergy have inscribed in the Christian roster the names of hundreds
who were total disbelievers in their dogmas. As the venders of quack
nostrums attach the forged certificates of distinguished individuals to
their worthless drugs, to make them sell, so these theological venders
present the manufactured endorsements of the great to make their
nostrums popular. Washington, Jefferson and Franklin have all been
denominated Christians, not because they were such, for they were not,
but because of the influence that attaches to their names. Paine's
opposition to priestcraft was too pronounced and too well known to claim
him as an adherent of their faith, and so they have sought to destroy
his influence by destroying his good name. Not only this, knowing the
prejudice that has prevailed against Atheism, they have misrepresented
his theological opinions and declared him an Atheist."--_The Fathers of
Our Republic._
"This injustice to him was perpetrated in defense of a system that
does not care, because it does not dare to have its credentials and
foundation critically examined; in other words, Paine has been maligned
for more than a century by those interested in keeping veiled the image;
he did what he could--and it was much--to uncover to the gaze of the
world."--_E. C. Walker._
William M. Salter, A. M.: "It is to the shame of religious prejudice in
our country that he is not freely and gladly given his place alongside
of Franklin and Washington."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account