‘By Dr. Blair’s means I have been favoured with the perusal of
your performance, which I have read with great pleasure and
attention. It is certainly very rare that a piece so deeply
philosophical is wrote with so much spirit, and affords so
much entertainment to the reader, though I must still regret
the disadvantages under which I read it, as I never had the
whole performance at once before me, and could not be able
to compare one part with another. To this reason chiefly I
ascribe some obscurities which, in spite of your short analysis
and abstract, seem to hang over your system; for I must do
you the justice to own that when I enter into your ideas, no
man appears to express himself with greater perspicuity than
you do, a talent which above all others is requisite in that
species of literature which you have cultivated. There are
some objections which I would willingly propose to the chapter
“Of Sight,” did I not suspect that they arise from my not
sufficiently understanding it. I shall therefore forbear till
the whole can lie before me, and shall not at present propose
any further difficulties to your reasonings. I shall only say
that if you have been able to clear up these abstruse and
important subjects, instead of being mortified, I shall be so
vain as to pretend to a share of the praise; and shall think
that my errors, by having at least some coherence, have led you
to make a more strict review of my principles, which were the
common ones, and to perceive their futility.’
In his reply to this letter Reid recognises the debt which philosophy
owes to the sceptical criticism of Hume. He writes thus to Hume:—
‘KING’S COLLEGE, _18th March 1763_.
‘SIR,—On Monday last Mr. John Farquhar brought me your letter
of February 25th, enclosed in one from Dr. Blair. I thought
myself very happy in having the means of obtaining, at second
hand, through the friendship of Dr. Blair, your opinion of
my performance; and you have been pleased to communicate it
directly in so polite and friendly a manner as merits great
acknowledgments on my part.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account