Artists and patrons -- Fiction; Authors and readers -- Fiction; Humorous stories; Italy -- Fiction; Satire
CHAPTER XII
Miss Thriplow was writing in her secret note-book. “There are people,”
she wrote, “who seem to have no capacity for feeling deeply or
passionately about anything. It is a kind of emotional impotence for
which one can only pity them profoundly. Perhaps there are more of these
people nowadays than there were. But that’s only an impression; one has
no facts to go on, no justifying documents. But if it’s the case, it’s
due, I suppose, to our intellectualising education. One has to have a
strong emotional constitution to be able to stand it. And then one lives
so artificially that many of the profounder instincts rarely get an
opportunity for displaying themselves. Fear, for example, and all the
desperate passions evoked by the instinct of self-preservation in face
of danger or hunger. Thousands of civilised people pass through life
condemned to an almost complete ignorance of these emotions.”
Miss Thriplow drew a line under this paragraph and began again a little
further down the page.
“To love primitively, with fury. To be no more civilised, but savage. No
more critical, but whole-heartedly passionate. No more a troubled and
dubious mind, but a young, healthy body certain and unwavering in its
desires. The beast knows everything, says Uncle Yerochka in Tolstoy. Not
everything; no. But he knows, at any rate, all the things the mind does
not know. The strong complete spirit must know what the beast knows as
well as what the mind knows.”
She drew another line.
“His hands are so strong and firm, and yet touch so softly. His lips are
soft. Where his neck joins his body, in front, between the two strong
tendons, where they converge towards the collar bone, is a boldly marked
depression in the flesh that looks as though it had been made by the
thumb of an artist god, so beautiful it is. So beautiful....”
It occurred to Miss Thriplow that there would be an excellent article to
be written round the theme of masculine beauty. In the Song of Solomon
it is described as lyrically as feminine beauty. It is rare to find
modern poetesses expressing so frank an admiration. In the Paris Salons
it is the female nude which prevails; the male is exceptional and, when
complete, seems a little shocking. How different from the state of
things in Pompeii! Miss Thriplow bit the end of her pen. Yes, decidedly,
it would make a capital article.
“His skin is white and smooth,” she went on writing. “How strong he is!
His eyes are sleepy; but sometimes they seem to wake up and he looks at
me so piercingly and commandingly that I am frightened. But I like being
frightened—by him.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account